Dear Christoph,
> Concerning LightDM: it has some advantages over LXDM and is as
> mentioned, well maintained.
LXDM is maintained, too. The developer is not as active as lightdm
upstream, but this is mostly because he is not backed up by a big
company (lightdm is run by Canonical). He is very responsive to bug
reports and he is using Fedora for development. This makes maintenance a
lot easier for me.
lightdm on the other hand is hard, it is developed on Ubuntu and when I
started packaging it, required a lot of patches to get it running on
anything but Debian/Ubuntu.
Ok, these are good points. Thanks.
Marcus
> I am not sure about the memory footprint,
> but I guess it should be at least as light as LXDM.
No it's not.
Kind regards,
Christoph
_______________________________________________
lxde mailing list
lxde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/lxde