Hi again.
Thanks very much for volunteering! Here is the BZ:
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 19:46:24 +0200 Marcus Moeller
<mail(a)marcusmoeller.ch> wrote:
> Dear Ranjan
>
>> I have been a bit concerned about the lack of aggressive maintenance
>> in the Fedora LXDE spin components (eg: inexplicable ssh flaw -- see
>> BZ, for which a fix is suggested by users but not put in place), but I
>> wonder why you think that getting LightDM as the display manager would
>> make a major difference?
>
> I don't know the ssh flaw you mentioned. If you want me to take a look
> at it, please link the BZ.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820514
This should also be fixed by switching to LightDM. At least it works
fine here.
Greets
Marcus
>
> Concerning LightDM: it has some advantages over LXDM and is as
> mentioned, well maintained. I am not sure about the memory footprint,
> but I guess it should be at least as light as LXDM.
Thanks! What about SLiM (the original DM of LXDE) as another
alternative?
Best wishes,
Ranjan
> Greets
> Marcus
>
>> Of course, I do not know what issues arise in maintaining a DM. Maybe
>> they are the biggest part of the DE?
>>
>> Ranjan
>>
>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:57:45 -0400 Marcus Moeller
>> <mail(a)marcusmoeller.ch> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> I know that LXDM might be more directly related to LXDE, but it seems
>>> that LightDM is a reasonable, well maintained alternative.
>>>
>>> Do you think it could be an option to use LightDM instead of LXDM for
>>> the LXDE spin?
>>>
>>> Greets
>>> Marcus
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lxde mailing list
>>> lxde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/lxde
>
> _______________________________________________
> lxde mailing list
> lxde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/lxde