Dear Ranjan
I have been a bit concerned about the lack of aggressive maintenance
in the Fedora LXDE spin components (eg: inexplicable ssh flaw -- see
BZ, for which a fix is suggested by users but not put in place), but I
wonder why you think that getting LightDM as the display manager would
make a major difference?
I don't know the ssh flaw you mentioned. If you want me to take a look
at it, please link the BZ.
Concerning LightDM: it has some advantages over LXDM and is as
mentioned, well maintained. I am not sure about the memory footprint,
but I guess it should be at least as light as LXDM.
Greets
Marcus
Of course, I do not know what issues arise in maintaining a DM.
Maybe
they are the biggest part of the DE?
Ranjan
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:57:45 -0400 Marcus Moeller
<mail(a)marcusmoeller.ch> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I know that LXDM might be more directly related to LXDE, but it seems
> that LightDM is a reasonable, well maintained alternative.
>
> Do you think it could be an option to use LightDM instead of LXDM for
> the LXDE spin?
>
> Greets
> Marcus
> _______________________________________________
> lxde mailing list
> lxde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/lxde