A few observations regarding Fedora LXQt 35
by Bhikhu
A few observations about Fedora 35 LXQt that might be of help to the devs.
First, the official page is misleading in a way. It lists Quassel,
FeatherPad, qpdfview, Dragon Player, Yarock as the part of the default
distribution but none of them are there on the ISO. I mean inclusion of
one application per task wouldn't have bloated the ISO that much, would
it have?
Falkon ain't bad but wouldn't it be better to include Firefox as the
default browser?
Enki the text-editor fails to launch because of some Python/QT related
shenanigans. There aren't that many apps on the ISO, so I'm surprised
that no one tested/QA this before it landed on the release ISO. Not
something that you'd expect from an official spin of Fedora.
LXDM lists openbox as one of the available sessions but trying to
selecting and logging into it, ends up freezing LXDM. Nothing happens.
These are not groundbreaking things but coming from an official spin of
Fedora, these things are deeply disappointing. I hate to compare
different distributions but there is Lubuntu that is an officially
recognized spin of Ubuntu and the difference in quality of the default
install between Fedora LXQt and Lubuntu are striking. I hope the devs
will take this criticism positively and take a queue or two from Lubuntu
and Fedora LXQt 36 will be a much better and professional offering than
35. Good luck.
--
signature.html /Bhikhu/ <mailto:hakerdefo@gmail.com>
My Blog -> https://hakerdefo.github.io
My Projects -> https://github.com/hakerdefo
This message and its contents may be confidential. If you received this
message in error, please inform the sender and delete the message. Thank
you.
1 year, 10 months
Is there a way to get LXQt 1.0 in Fedora?
by Sergei S. Rublёv
Hello all! I have recently started using LXQt with Fedora and had a good experience. I have installed it via command line first. And some time later I fresh-installed Fedora-LXQt (35) spin. They install LXQt 0.17.0. LXQt developers at GitHub say actual version is 1.0. Is there a way to get LXQt 1.0 working in Fedora? I cannot understand instructions about "compiling from source".
2 years, 2 months
Re: LXQt Rawhide status
by Zamir SUN
Hi Adam,
Thanks for the remind. I thought I've rebuilt everything. I'll check
right now to see what's happening.
On 1/19/22 07:08, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi Zamir! I just wanted to check in on LXQt status in Rawhide. I was
> looking through failed images in Rawhide composes, and LXQt is one of
> them. It's failing because of a couple of dependencies:
>
> 2022-01-18 08:09:51,108 INFO pylorax: Problem 1: conflicting requests
> 2022-01-18 08:09:51,108 INFO pylorax: - nothing provides libqtermwidget5.so.0()(64bit) needed by qterminal-0.17.0-1.fc35.x86_64
> 2022-01-18 08:09:51,108 INFO pylorax: - nothing provides qtermwidget = 0.17.0 needed by qterminal-0.17.0-1.fc35.x86_64
> 2022-01-18 08:09:51,108 INFO pylorax: Problem 2: conflicting requests
> 2022-01-18 08:09:51,108 INFO pylorax: - nothing provides liblxqt-globalkeys.so.0()(64bit) needed by lxqt-powermanagement-0.17.1-1.fc35.x86_64
> 2022-01-18 08:09:51,108 INFO pylorax: - nothing provides liblxqt.so.0()(64bit) needed by lxqt-powermanagement-0.17.1-1.fc35.x86_64
>
> I looked in git and it looks like you have a qterminal 1.0 bump
> committed but not built. So are you in the middle of a more complex
> update, or what? I didn't want to just start building things so I
> thought I'd check :) thanks!
>
--
Zamir SUN
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
Want to know more about Fedora?
Visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
Ready to contribute? See https://whatcanidoforfedora.org/
想了解更多中文资讯，访问 https://zh.fedoracommunity.org/
2 years, 2 months
