On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 09:11:06AM +0200, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017, at 11:59 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-08-03/magazine.2017-08... Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-08-03/magazine.2017-08... Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-08-03/magazine.2017-08...
=========================================
#fedora-meeting: Magazine editorial board
- Mapping out blueprints for Flock 2017 (jwf, 21:44:16)
- LINK: https://flock2017.sched.com/ (jwf, 21:52:10)
- ACTION: stickster email bexelbie et al. to ask about Sched.org population (stickster, 21:54:20)
To make this more public, I expect sched to go live next week. I don't know that many, if any sessions will relate to non-contributors. If Magazine publishes about attending Flock, please emphasize that it is a contributor focused conference so people do not get the wrong impression.
Totally agreed on the focus.
This item actually is in a different context though -- we on the Magazine staff are trying to map out sessions whose proceedings we want to expand into coverage articles. In other words, while the conference is contributor-driven, sessions will concern things that impact users. We want to cover outcomes of those sessions in the Magazine so the end-user community gets advance notice of cool things happening in the project.
Examples might be availability of new Fedora editions, or changes in production schedule. Counter-examples would be our release/build tools, or community organizational changes.