On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 4:29 PM Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 13:44:37 -0400, Paul Frields wrote:
> One way to split it would be after Step 1 of the spec file section.
> up to this point is informational (and well done!). So the first part
> thus be informational about RPMs, and the second part would be all about
> building of RPMs.
> How does that sound?
Thanks---that works. I broke the article into two. The first stops at
source RPMs, and the second goes on to look at spec files:
- source RPMS:
- spec files etc:
They are both ready for review.
Nice, that looks good.
I've reviewed the first one and scheduled it for today. I think we could
plan the other one for next Monday.
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
Time zone: Europe/London
Senior Software Engineer