Hi Paul, I've noticed the comments and have responded to them. I knew
going into the article some people might not understand the
technicalities of optimizing sound quality. The comments and feedback
have helped with clarifying that for the average audio listener.
It seems there's a blur between the lines. The sentence begining with,
“By eliminating Pulseaudio…” should be a new paragraph. Are we able to
fix this post-publish?
I will review part 2 tonight and add a recap in the beginning briefly
explaining the purpose for the audio tweaking from part 1 and it's
relation to the second part.
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 17:07 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 03:08:18PM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> Part 2 of the DIY Digital Jukebox article is ready for review at
> Let me know if it requires additional editing.
Thank you Shaun. There seem to be a number of comments on Part 1
which it may be helpful for you to review and comment on.
For instance, it's not clear to people yet why the real-time
is important for the jukebox. So that would be something you'll want
to cover in Part 2 for sure.