New preview links (I hope).
Part 1: https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=17880&preview=1&_ppp=8de1fb8558 Part 2: https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=17929&preview=1&_ppp=3115e531ea
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 23:03 -0700, Link Dupont wrote:
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 16:13 -0700, Link Dupont wrote:
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 21:39 +0000, Justin W. Flory wrote:
On 07/03/2017 11:09 PM, Link Dupont wrote:
Perfect feedback. I'll give that a pass. Do you think there's too much time spent on setting up AWS? I was thinking about a slight restructuring of the article to focus more on duplicity, and leave most of the AWS stuff up to the user. Basically writing the article assuming that the user has their AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID and AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY already and just telling them to plug them in.
Hey Link,
This came up during the meeting today. We remembered that you wanted to wait until all three articles in the series were complete before you published them. However, in the release upgrade article…
https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=17971&preview=1&_ppp=0dcd79e67b…we briefly mention about taking backups, and point to a PkgDB link for deja-dup. What do you think about publishing the first one on Monday, and then cross-linking this in the upgrade instruction article? This might help give the series a long shelf-life since the upgrade article gets a lot of traffic for a couple months after an upgrade (so ideally, people might discover the whole backup series by looking up instructions on how to upgrade).
However, we wanted to check with you if you want to do this first. We could always go back later and edit the link to your series once all the drafts are up. What do you think?
Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraprojec t. or g
Echoing what I said in #fedora-magazine. It looks like part 3 (deja- dup) *won't* build (technically) on top of part 1 (duplicity) like I originally thought. Part 2 (duply) can definitely build on top of part 1 though. So I'd like to have part 1 and 2 finalized before publishing so that the full backup created in part 1 is detected by duply in part 2.
Both articles do exist in draft form. I'm currently editing the commands in part 2 to make sure the output is correct, and the duply profile detects the full backup created with duplicity. Both articles are mostly complete. Once I've given them another pass over to make sure the commands are correct, they'll still need an editorial review. If someone can possibly edit them over the weekend, then we could probably publish part 1 on Monday.
They both articles also will need feature images. I had hoped to try one on my own, but maybe Ryan should crank out one for Part 1 so it's ready for publishing on Monday.
~link _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproject. or g
I finished up Part 1 and Part 2. I'd greatly appreciate an editorial eye; I made a number of changes late tonight, and I know my error count goes up significantly the later in the evening I write.
Also I'd like it if someone could follow the steps to make sure I didn't make any assumptions about software on my system.
~link _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproject.or g