One way to split it would be after Step 1 of the spec file section.
Everything up to this point is informational (and well done!). So the first
part would thus be informational about RPMs, and the second part would be
all about the building of RPMs.
How does that sound?
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:19 AM Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 14:24:46 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 15:56, Adam Samalik <asamalik(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > That looks really good! I'm sure we'll get it scheduled tomorrow
> > meeting.
> Hi Ankur,
> We have discussed your article during today's editor's meeting.
> We felt that your article could benefit from being 2 separate articles,
> that something that you think you could do? If not that's fine with us
> we will publish it as it is ☺
Sure. How would you suggest it be split? I had originally thought I'd
limit the first post to the src rpm only, and then cover the spec file
in another, but somehow they feel incomplete that way. :/
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
Time zone: Europe/London
Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines