Tweaks/amends to "New third party repositories" magazine post

[Ankur Sinha]

Hello!

I just saw the new post speaking about the Workstation's new third-party
repositories. Would it be possible to please amend it to include more
information on how this new feature aligns with Fedora's foundations?
We're working on a draft of what will become the page that Gnome
software will link to here already, and @pfrields already made an
editorial pass over it here too. Otherwise, given that the magazine is
our primary user facing outlet of information, I worry that users will
read the info here and it'd prevent them from paying enough attention to
the official document.

So, it'll be good if the magazine post says the same thing, in the same
way - stressing that we're committed to FOSS, and that it's being done
to improve usability while also giving visibility to the FOSS
alternatives? @ryanlerch @pfrields - what do you think?

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha/Third_Party_Software_Reposito...
https://fedoramagazine.org/third-party-repositories-fedora/

(Originally filed here https://pagure.io/fedora-marketing/issue/275)

Thanks for all the great work that goes into the magazine :)

[Rahul Sundaram]

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 11:50 AM Ankur Sinha  wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I just saw the new post speaking about the Workstation's new third-party
> repositories. Would it be possible to please amend it to include more
> information on how this new feature aligns with Fedora's foundations?

(Just about signed to this mailing list.  Hi everyone!)

It is a bit late to amend the article significantly but I think a followup
article that talks the rationale, limitations etc would be quite useful.
Perhaps you want to write one?  I can help edit if you like

Rahul

[Ankur Sinha]

On Tue, May 01, 2018 00:41:16 +0000, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

Hiya!
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 11:50 AM Ankur Sinha  wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I just saw the new post speaking about the Workstation's new third-party
> repositories. Would it be possible to please amend it to include more
> information on how this new feature aligns with Fedora's foundations?
>
>
> (Just about signed to this mailing list.  Hi everyone!)
>
> It is a bit late to amend the article significantly but I think a followup
> article that talks the rationale, limitations etc would be quite useful.  
> Perhaps you want to write one?  I can help edit if you like

Yes, that sounds like a plan. I'll get started on it right away :)