Comment on LWN regarding articles license

[Michael Scherer]

Hi,

do not know if I should send that to discourse or here, but I stumbled
on this
https://lwn.net/Articles/836318/

this comment speak of license of fedora magazine being unclear (due to
ToS), maybe some should be clarified in the template.

Also, this date back to 2013, it still reference the old RH HQ
location, we moved since, so at least, that part should be updated ?

-- 
Michael Scherer / He/Il/Er/Él
Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure

[Paul Frields]

The terms and conditions on the site make it very clear that content not
marked otherwise is CC BY-SA 3.0. Can you be more specific about what is
unclear?

Keep in mind we do not want to make an additional mark on individual pages
or stories about the licensing terms. That would inevitably conflict with
having a single T&C that explains everything.

On Fri, Nov 6, 2020, 9:44 AM Michael Scherer <mscherer(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  Hi,
>
>  do not know if I should send that to discourse or here, but I stumbled
>  on this
>  https://lwn.net/Articles/836318/
>
>  this comment speak of license of fedora magazine being unclear (due to
>  ToS), maybe some should be clarified in the template.
>
>  Also, this date back to 2013, it still reference the old RH HQ
>  location, we moved since, so at least, that part should be updated ?
>
>  --
>  Michael Scherer / He/Il/Er/Él
>  Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct:
>  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives:
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]...
>

[Paul Frields]

Actually, let's not discuss on this list because it's not the one we
really use these days. Go to Discourse and feel free to follow and
join in there -- thanks!

On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 12:02 PM Paul Frields <stickster(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>
> The terms and conditions on the site make it very clear that content not marked
otherwise is CC BY-SA 3.0. Can you be more specific about what is unclear?
>
> Keep in mind we do not want to make an additional mark on individual pages or stories
about the licensing terms. That would inevitably conflict with having a single T&C
that explains everything.
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2020, 9:44 AM Michael Scherer <mscherer(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> do not know if I should send that to discourse or here, but I stumbled
>> on this
>> https://lwn.net/Articles/836318/
>>
>> this comment speak of license of fedora magazine being unclear (due to
>> ToS), maybe some should be clarified in the template.
>>
>> Also, this date back to 2013, it still reference the old RH HQ
>> location, we moved since, so at least, that part should be updated ?
>>
>> --
>> Michael Scherer / He/Il/Er/Él
>> Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]...

[Michael Scherer]

Le vendredi 06 novembre 2020 à 12:02 -0500, Paul Frields a écrit :
>  The terms and conditions on the site make it very clear that content
>  not
>  marked otherwise is CC BY-SA 3.0. Can you be more specific about what
>  is
>  unclear? 
I am just the messenger, the person who do not find clarity is the
comment poster on LWN.

But I will repost on discourse, sure, I wasn't sure if this was just
for editorial proposal or not.

>  Keep in mind we do not want to make an additional mark on individual
>  pages
>  or stories about the licensing terms. That would inevitably conflict
>  with
>  having a single T&C that explains everything. 
-- 
Michael Scherer / He/Il/Er/Él
Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure

[Paul Frields]

Looks like the discussion is already on discourse, you can follow here:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/improving-license-text/24430

On Fri, Nov 6, 2020, 1:21 PM Michael Scherer <mscherer(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  Le vendredi 06 novembre 2020 à 12:02 -0500, Paul Frields a écrit :
>  > The terms and conditions on the site make it very clear that content
>  > not
>  > marked otherwise is CC BY-SA 3.0. Can you be more specific about what
>  > is
>  > unclear?
>
>  I am just the messenger, the person who do not find clarity is the
>  comment poster on LWN.
>
>  But I will repost on discourse, sure, I wasn't sure if this was just
>  for editorial proposal or not.
>
>  > Keep in mind we do not want to make an additional mark on individual
>  > pages
>  > or stories about the licensing terms. That would inevitably conflict
>  > with
>  > having a single T&C that explains everything.
>  --
>  Michael Scherer / He/Il/Er/Él
>  Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure
>
>
>
>