One of the things that distinguishes RHEL and Fedora from other distributions is having
SELinux installed and enabled by default. It definitely should never be disabled. It's
a huge security risk to do so.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gregory Lee Bartholomew" <gregory.lee.bartholomew(a)gmail.com>
To: "Paul Frields" <stickster(a)gmail.com>
Cc: "magazine" <magazine(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>, "story
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 2:29:03 PM
Subject: Re: A few newbie editor questions
Thanks, I took you advice for my own article and just responded to the critique with a
more detailed explanation of what I was trying to say.
A similar situation has just arisen with another article -- Story Teller's article is
being criticized for suggesting that selinux be disabled and he has requested that the
document be revised (last comment on kanban's #101:
). Should I revise
the article or should Story Teller just reply to the comments? Also, I haven't been
approving the comments. Is that something that you want me to do?
On Fri, 2020-01-24 at 12:45 +0100, Paul Frields wrote:
The best way to deal with this comment IMHO is just to politely
In general, I don't think we should remove things once published (except in a case
like a bad/duplicate paste), and in those cases, provide an "EDIT:" note in the
article to show what's changed. Just my $0.02.
Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Curt Warfield RHCSA, RHCE | Technical Support Engineer
Global Support Services
Public key = 12D12957
Key fingerprint = 48CF 137D 89EF 6781 FBFE AEE7 53AE 9C97 12D1 2957
Red Hat, Inc.
100 East Davie Street | Raleigh, NC 27601