Hi Story Teller,
We were looking at your article "Build your own cloud with Fedora 30 and nextcloud". Since Fedora 31 is out, it might be better to use that as the reference version. Can you please make any updates needed for F31 or let us know if it needs to stay on Fedora 30?
https://fedoramagazine.org/wp-admin/post.php?post=29554
Thanks, BC
(This time with a hopefully-functional email)
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 8:27 AM Ben Cotton bcotton@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Story Teller,
We were looking at your article "Build your own cloud with Fedora 30 and nextcloud". Since Fedora 31 is out, it might be better to use that as the reference version. Can you please make any updates needed for F31 or let us know if it needs to stay on Fedora 30?
https://fedoramagazine.org/wp-admin/post.php?post=29554
Thanks, BC
-- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
Also might be a good idea for storyteller to log in to Taiga here: https://teams.fedoraproject.org/project/asamalik-fedora-magazine/kanban
Use the link at top right -- then use OpenID Connect on the login page where you can provide your Fedora account username and password. Let us know you got in, and we can assign this story card to you.
Paul
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 8:29 AM Ben Cotton bcotton@redhat.com wrote:
(This time with a hopefully-functional email)
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 8:27 AM Ben Cotton bcotton@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Story Teller,
We were looking at your article "Build your own cloud with Fedora 30 and nextcloud". Since Fedora 31 is out, it might be better to use that as the reference version. Can you please make any updates needed for F31 or let us know if it needs to stay on Fedora 30?
https://fedoramagazine.org/wp-admin/post.php?post=29554
Thanks, BC
-- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
-- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/magazine@lists.fedoraproject.o...
On 06. 11. 19 14:27, Ben Cotton wrote:
Hi Story Teller,
We were looking at your article "Build your own cloud with Fedora 30 and nextcloud". Since Fedora 31 is out, it might be better to use that as the reference version. Can you please make any updates needed for F31 or let us know if it needs to stay on Fedora 30?
As a side note:
I cannot see that preview, but note that nextcloud is orphaned in Fedora and the latest packaged version is 10.x (from 2016), while upstream is at 17.x.
It is full of CVEs: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/nextcloud/bugs/all
If no new maintainer is found, it will be retired in ~6 weeks.
Does this article suggest to dnf install nextcloud from the Fedora repos?
That's exactly what it says. I don't think we want to direct users to use an ancient version or something that's soon to be retired. Perhaps the article should be updated to use an upstream provided package, or another alternative?
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 4:00 AM Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
On 06. 11. 19 14:27, Ben Cotton wrote:
Hi Story Teller,
We were looking at your article "Build your own cloud with Fedora 30 and nextcloud". Since Fedora 31 is out, it might be better to use that as the reference version. Can you please make any updates needed for F31 or let us know if it needs to stay on Fedora 30?
As a side note:
I cannot see that preview, but note that nextcloud is orphaned in Fedora and the latest packaged version is 10.x (from 2016), while upstream is at 17.x.
It is full of CVEs: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/nextcloud/bugs/all
If no new maintainer is found, it will be retired in ~6 weeks.
Does this article suggest to dnf install nextcloud from the Fedora repos?
-- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/magazine@lists.fedoraproject.o...
On 07. 11. 19 13:33, Paul Frields wrote:
That's exactly what it says. I don't think we want to direct users to use an ancient version or something that's soon to be retired.
And known to be insecure. I don't think we should do that.
Perhaps the article should be updated to use an upstream provided package, or another alternative?
I don't want to discuss whether recommending that is a good marketing for Fedora, but we definitively need to switch the recommended installation method, or postpone the article until a new maintainer is found (and only change the method if there is none).
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 7:38 AM Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
I don't want to discuss whether recommending that is a good marketing for Fedora, but we definitively need to switch the recommended installation method, or postpone the article until a new maintainer is found (and only change the method if there is none).
Agreed. I'd prefer to wait until such time as it has a maintainer and is up-to-date. Skimming the install docs[1], it looks like manual installs (except with a snap) are probably more than we'd want in a magazine article.
Good catch, Miro!
[1] https://docs.nextcloud.com/server/17/admin_manual/installation/source_instal...
magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org