Marketing-trac: #126: Create a wiki page for magazine covermount information
by Marketing Team
#126: Create a wiki page for magazine covermount information
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: pfrields | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: F14a: Pre-alpha
Component: other | Severity: urgent
Keywords: |
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
We often get inquiries from magazines asking for permission to bundle one
or more Fedora discs with a future issue. This is a fairly routine
process as long as the disc is an unmodified copy of Fedora media (i.e. an
official release). Some interaction with Red Hat Legal is required to
send out an agreement to the magazine.
We can speed up that interaction and the overall process if we have a page
that tells magazines what they need to provide, and to whom, for a
covermount agreement. Generally we need the following information, sent
to the ''press(a)fp.o'' address:
* The name (d/b/a) and address of the company producing the magazine
* The exact disc(s) that are to be bundled
* Contact information for the person making the request
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/marketing-team/ticket/126>
marketing-team <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing>
Marketing team for the Fedora project.
10 years, 1 month
Marketing-trac: #125: SSSD F13 feature -- press blog entry
by Marketing Team
#125: SSSD F13 feature -- press blog entry
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: pfrields | Owner: pfrields
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: F14a: Pre-alpha
Component: Feature Stories | Severity: urgent
Keywords: meeting |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
I had suggested this earlier to Robyn -- a press blog entry for Red Hat's
PR channel (http://press.redhat.com) that would synopsize and point to our
interview on the wiki. However, Robyn's pretty busy right now. Kara
Schiltz from Red Hat's PR department is willing to publish something next
week.
I'm going to pick this up and drive it forward, my way of helping this
week on something Marketing related!
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/marketing-team/ticket/125>
marketing-team <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing>
Marketing team for the Fedora project.
10 years, 1 month
Marketing-trac: #128: Press Release for FUDCon KL 2012
by Marketing Team
#128: Press Release for FUDCon KL 2012
--------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: izhar | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Future releases
Component: FUDCon | Severity: urgent
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
--------------------+------------------------------
Hi,
Could we have a press-release for FUDCon KL 2012 which is happening this
May?. We are planning to distribute it to local newspapers and news sites.
We are originally planning to produce our own but FPL said that marketing
might want to do and approve it.
In term of dateline, .. erm .. is 27th March too short?, or more than
enough?. The earlier the better of course
Thanks.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/marketing-team/ticket/128>
marketing-team <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing>
Marketing team for the Fedora project.
10 years, 1 month
Re: Please review / comment on / help with AWS Marketplace listing
by Matthew Miller
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:07:10AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Highlight1:
> Free and Open Source: built by a collaborative community using entirely
> free software.
> Highlight2:
> Core Image Ready to Build Upon: use yum to add any of tens of thousands of
> software packages, or drop in your own code.
> Highlight3:
> NEED SOMETHING HERE
> [Security? Fedora-ness? Values? Highlight some particlar awesomness?]
Ideas, anyone?
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
10 years, 11 months
Re: Please review / comment on / help with AWS Marketplace listing
by Robyn Bergeron
On 10/25/2012 07:07 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Here's the details for the form I'm going to submit. Would appreciate your
> input, especially on the Highlights. My comments in [brackets].
All in all, I think it looks reasonably decent. I have some comments on
some of the descriptions - I think the Overview page on the wiki has a
lot of usefulness in terms of description of community/product.
My other note is that - esp. in the "company description" since it's the
page about "fedora" the distro - we should probably be more consistent
in our references to Fedora vs. the Fedora Project -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Overview
>
> Company Description:
>
> The Fedora Project is a worldwide community of people who love, use, and
> build free software. We want to lead in the creation and spread of free
> code and content by working together as a community. Fedora is sponsored
> by Red Hat, the world's most trusted provider of open source technology.
> Red Hat invests in Fedora to encourage collaboration and incubate
> innovative new free software technologies.
Maybe... and can we break it up into 2 paragraphs?
The Fedora Project is a worldwide, open partnership of free software
contributors and enthusiasts. Our mission is to lead the advancement of
free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
The Fedora Project is primarily sponsored by Red Hat, the world's most
trusted provider of open source technology. (I'm not quite sold on your
last line re: why red hat invests, but can go either way, I'm not too picky)
One thing to consider: Is it worth highlighting more specifically that
Fedora is the upstream for RHEL?
>
> Software By:
>
> Fedora Project
>
> Title:
>
> Fedora 17
>
> Version Title:
>
> Fedora 17 (Beefy Miracle) 2012.05.15
>
> [Note: I put the date there because I'd like to leave open the option of
> updated image spins. Open to suggestions on how best to do this.]
That's fine, though I think it would be good to make clear that it's not
something like a "nightly image" kind of thing. We don't have to drill
into details on "how we'd do that" right now, I agree it's useful to
keep the option open.
>
> Release Notes:
>
> Official Fedora Cloud image.
>
> Description:
>
> Fedora is a Linux-based operating system built on our community's four
> foundations: freedom, features, friends, and first. The Fedora Cloud image
> in EC2 provides a functional core on top of which any of tens of thousands
> of free and open source software packages can be easily added.
/Fedora/is a Linux-based operating system that providesa wide audience
of users <http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User_base>with access to the
latestfree and open source software
<http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html>, in astable
<http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA>,secure
<http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/Features>and easy to manage
form. The Fedora cloud image in EC2 (blah blah blah, what you have above)
>
> Highlight1:
>
> Free and Open Source: built by a collaborative community using entirely
> free software.
>
> Highlight2:
>
> Core Image Ready to Build Upon: use yum to add any of tens of thousands of
> software packages, or drop in your own code.
>
> [Avoid "minimal", because it isn't. Should I use a more precise count of
> packages?]
>
> Highlight3:
>
> NEED SOMETHING HERE
>
> [Security? Fedora-ness? Values? Highlight some particlar awesomness?]
>
> Support Offered:
>
> FALSE
>
> [This is a boolean. We _do_ offer community support, of course. Should
> maybe be true?]
Ehhhhhhhhhhhhh. That seems misleading, I think to have it as true.
>
> Support Detail:
>
> Community supported. Visit Ask Fedora (http://ask.fedoraproject.org/), or
> get involved by joining the Fedora Cloud SIG
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud_SIG). You can help us make Fedora in
> the Cloud even more awesome for everyone.
>
> Product Category1:
>
> Operating System
>
> Product Category2:
>
> [blank]
>
> Search Keywords:
>
> open source, free, core
>
> Image URL:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-options#cloud
>
> Resource1 Name & Resource1 URL:
>
> Fedora Project
> https://fedoraproject.org/
>
> Resource2 Name & Resource2 URL:
>
> Fedora Cloud SIG
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud_SIG
>
> Resource3 Name & Resource3 URL:
>
> Source Code
> http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/17/Fedora/sou...
I guess this is more of a technical question: How does the above link
accurately represent things if we - as you described above - have
different "more updated but still F17" images? Do we think people will
be confused / looking for F17 - date/morepreciseversion/etc?
>
> Product Video:
>
> [none]
>
> Usage Instructions:
>
> Connect with SSH. No web services are installed or configured by default.
> Fedora's EC2 images follow standard EC2 login conventions, meaning that
> root login is disabled, but sudo access is granted. The default username
> for the images is ec2-user.
>
> End User License Agreement Text:
>
> [Copied from
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/LicenseAgreement17]
>
> Refund and Cancelation Policy:
>
> Fedora is available free of charge. Normal Amazon Web Services terms
> apply.
We might include something saying "Normal Amazon Web Services terms and
charges" or "terms, including costs for storage and
bandwidth/uploading/downloading/whatever" apply.
Also: Since we have a mirror internal to amazon - is that something
worth highlighting? Or does the AWS marketplace work differently from
regular EC2 (I haven't looked in detail at any differences)
>
>
> Available in Regions....
>
> True for all.
This is not really true in EC2, I don't think we're doing Fedora in
non-us regions, are we? - does AWS marketplace provide wider availability?
>
>
> Endpoint URL Protocol:
>
> ssh
>
> [hopefully, I can get them to construct a ssh://ec2-user@.... URL]
>
>
> Upgrade Instructions:
>
> [Blank for now]
>
> Recommended Instance Type:
>
> Standard Large
Is this basically a bulletpoint option, or is there additional text that
we could include as to why (ie: standard large - Recommended for common
use cases like $unicornbuilding, $bikeshedding, etc)
>
> Available Instnace Types:
>
> All except GPU. (Including Micro)
>
> Pricing:
>
> Zeros.
>
> Security Groups:
>
> tcp, 80, 80, 0.0.0.0/0
> tcp, 443, 443, 0.0.0.0/0
> tcp, 22, 22, 0.0.0.0/0
>
> [These are defaults for one-click launch]
>
>
10 years, 11 months
help with AWS marketplace listing
by Matthew Miller
[Avoiding cross post since I think a lot of people are not on both list]
I just posted a message "Please review / comment on / help with AWS
Marketplace listing" to the Cloud SIG mailing list. I would very much
appreciate feedback from Fedora Marketing, since a lot of this is
essentially ad copy.
I follow both lists so I'm happy for feedback either here or there.
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
10 years, 11 months
Re: Getting FWN Rolling Again
by Ruth Suehle
Yup... and partly why I've been a little more slack than I meant to be.
Corralling this many people is hard! And since not everybody is on every
list, copying them all won't work that well either. So... I've got
marketing, news, docs, and logistics (Insight) copied here. How about if
everyone who is personally interested just email me off list by
Thursday, and I'll try to get us all into one IRC or discussion about
what to do. Does that work?
On 10/23/2012 07:19 PM, Bryan Sutherland wrote:
> Hi Ruth,
> I would also be interested in brainstorming across the Docs and
> Marketing teams. Also, I recall in a conversation on IRC when this
> was brought up initially it had been mentioned that a reincarnation of
> insight.fedoraproject.org would be the best avenue. In my opinion we
> could use the domain but it will need some reworking as the update
> mechanism is entirely manual IIRC.
>
> Cheers
> Bryan
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Arnav Kalra <arnavkalra007(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am interested in it.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Arnav Kalra
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Ruth Suehle <rsuehle(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Copying the marketing list because there's been interest there as well in
>>> putting some life back into FWN. How about a cross-team IRC meeting?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/23/2012 02:56 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>>>> Hi News Team --
>>>>
>>>> Let's talk about what we need to do to put the "Weekly" back in Fedora
>>>> Weekly News.
>>>>
>>>> I've been writing the "In the News" beat (on weeks when we put out an
>>>> issue), but I'm happy to help out more with editing, beat rustling, or
>>>> any other bottlenecks we identify.
>>>>
>>>> Would it make sense to schedule an irc meeting or perhaps a Google
>>>> Hangout to regroup?
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Jason
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> news mailing list
>>>> news(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/news
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> news mailing list
>>> news(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/news
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> news mailing list
>> news(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/news
> _______________________________________________
> news mailing list
> news(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/news
10 years, 11 months
Re: Getting FWN Rolling Again
by Ruth Suehle
Copying the marketing list because there's been interest there as well
in putting some life back into FWN. How about a cross-team IRC meeting?
On 10/23/2012 02:56 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
> Hi News Team --
>
> Let's talk about what we need to do to put the "Weekly" back in Fedora
> Weekly News.
>
> I've been writing the "In the News" beat (on weeks when we put out an
> issue), but I'm happy to help out more with editing, beat rustling, or
> any other bottlenecks we identify.
>
> Would it make sense to schedule an irc meeting or perhaps a Google
> Hangout to regroup?
>
> Regards, Jason
> _______________________________________________
> news mailing list
> news(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/news
10 years, 11 months
Self-Introduction: Adrian Soliard [asoliard]
by Adrian Soliard
Hi, my name is Adrian Soliard and I live in Paraná, Argentina. My
Fedora Account System (FAS) username is asoliard, and I am new to IRC
and would like help getting started!
I learned about the Fedora Marketing team through when I joined to the
ambassadors list, and am interested in joining because I want to share
Fedora; This is the first FOSS project I have worked on, and I'm
really motiated.
I've worked in Marketing in the past. The project I've worked was a
website (http://www.parananoduerme.com.ar) that promote social events,
parties, sport events, concerts (I closed it because I didn't have
time to control the administration and the staff that I had, but I'm
working to start again).
My skills, which I hope to utilize in Fedora Marketing, include:
Web promotion (I'm a
(Other Skills) - _____________________________________________
I'd also like to learn _________________.
When I'm not working on Fedora, I am:
· Working at government, at Dirección de Hidráulica, Entre Ríos
Province (http://www.hidraulica.gob.ar)
· Working in personal projects or freelance jobs
(http://www.adriansoliard.com.ar)
· Studying programming (development) at UTN
· Reading feeds to get updated about technologies, systems, and things I like
A couple of goals I have for the Fedora ProA couple of goals I have
for the Fedora Project are get them to use in the government (at least
where I'm working) and make people knows about free software, use it
without fear, and learn to take advantage.
I'm a GNU/Linux user since 2005, and I'm delighted with Fedora, I use
it only since last year and now I have installed it in 2 pc and 2
laptops in my home.
Please help me get started!
Goodbye,
Soliard, Adrian D.
http://www.adriansoliard.com.ar
10 years, 11 months
List of LUGs
by Ruth Suehle
Week before last, we discussed in the IRC meeting whether there was an
existing list of Linux User Groups around the world, and not finding
one, whether we could/should create one. Today I discovered we already
did...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LinuxUserGroups
Does anybody want to take on the task of working on making sure its
links are still working and adding to the list?
Ruth
10 years, 11 months
