marketing August 2014

marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

34 participants
74 discussions

Re: Marketing-trac: #12: Prepare short stories for "I use Fedora" rotations on fp.o/FI
by Marketing Team 09 Aug '14

09 Aug '14

#12: Prepare short stories for "I use Fedora" rotations on fp.o/FI --------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: pfrields | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: minor | Milestone: Open Component: other | Severity: not-urgent Resolution: invalid | Keywords: websites Blocked By: | Blocking: --------------------------+------------------------ Changes (by chrisroberts): * status: new => closed * resolution: => invalid -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/marketing-team/ticket/12#comment:4> marketing-team <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing> Marketing team for the Fedora project.

1 0

Duplicate post
by Ryan Lerch 09 Aug '14

09 Aug '14

Hi all, I had been posting a few of stephen Gallagher's posts on the magazine (with his permission) But it seems that someone posted the same content as a new post here today http://fedoramagazine.org/evolving-the-fedora-updates-process/ As the one I posted here yesterday: http://fedoramagazine.org/bodhi-2-update-management-infrastructure-to-land-… Any reason not to unpublish the one posted later without a featured image? Cheers, Ryanlerch

4 3

Flock Hackfest
by Chris Roberts 08 Aug '14

08 Aug '14

Hey everyone, Does 15:00-17:00 sound good for a hackfest today? As JZB stated there is an open room. I have been working on some stuff in the background to clean up the site and enhance a few things. - Chris Roberts

3 3

Marketing-trac: #140: Fedora 20 release flyer for developers
by Marketing Team 08 Aug '14

08 Aug '14

#140: Fedora 20 release flyer for developers ----------------------------------+------------------------------ Reporter: ankursinha | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Future releases Component: Release deliverables | Severity: not-urgent Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------------------+------------------------------ A flyer showcasing new features for developers would be great to have too. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/marketing-team/ticket/140> marketing-team <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing> Marketing team for the Fedora project.

3 4

Marketing-trac: #139: Release flyer for home users
by Marketing Team 08 Aug '14

08 Aug '14

#139: Release flyer for home users ----------------------------------+------------------------------ Reporter: ankursinha | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Future releases Component: Release deliverables | Severity: not-urgent Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------------------+------------------------------ A flyer that collates features for home users would be nice to have to give out at events. (Home users = non developers) -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/marketing-team/ticket/139> marketing-team <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing> Marketing team for the Fedora project.

1 7

Flock Hackfest?
by Joe Brockmeier 08 Aug '14

08 Aug '14

Who do we have at Flock that might be up for a hackfest on Friday or Saturday? Looks like there is one open room on Saturday from 15:00 - 17:00 and / or we could meet for lunch on Friday and/or Saturday. Thoughts, comments, flames? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

3 2

Re: Introduction and First submission.
by Mark Lamourine 08 Aug '14

08 Aug '14

Oopps. Not dot com.... On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Mark Lamourine <markllama(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all. > > I'm Mark Lamourine and I work at Red Hat in Westford MA, US. I followed > Mairin's link on G+ this morning to the Fedora Dev conference videos and to > the "we need help" page. Following her lead from a session I watched, I > signed up to report on the "Advocating Fedora.next" session. > > Then I think: OK I can write a few words about that. I wonder where it > should go? > > Which leads me to Fedora Magazine and the "join the magazine" paragraph > which says "get on the mailing list and introduce yourself". > > Consider me Introduced. > > I'm a sysadmin and software developer. I've been at Red Hat for 4 years, > but worked at Sun and at Genuity (among others). > > I've also been writing book reviews and one article for the USENIX ;login: > magazine for a few years. > > Now I have to find the dashboard and the "add post" link... but first look > at the guidelines and examples.... > > > Later! > > - Mark > > -- > ---- > Mark Lamourine <markllama(a)gmail.com> > Dad, Hubbie, Software Developer, System Administrator, Road Cyclist > -- ---- Mark Lamourine <markllama(a)gmail.com> Dad, Hubbie, Software Developer, System Administrator, Road Cyclist

1 0

Re: FLOCK coverage idea
by Ryan Lerch 07 Aug '14

07 Aug '14

On Aug 6, 2014 10:12 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 10:03:31AM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > > >I must have missed that bit. I was thinking if we combine coverage we > > >might draw more attention to talks than shorter individual posts, but > > >whatever. > > I did combos last year.... basically I did a brief synopsis for > > every talk, one blog post per day. Got really good coverage and > > every post got LWN coverage. > > FWIW > > Okay, I might be wrong. :) I was leaning towards lots of smaller posts. Most of the incoming links for the GUADEC posts were only related to one section of a larger post. I don't see the harm in having small posts -- easier for people to view the stream rather than wade through larger posts to read what they care about. Just my thoughts Ryanlerch > > -- > Matthew Miller > <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> > Fedora Project Leader > -- > marketing mailing list > marketing(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing

2 1

FLOCK coverage idea
by Ryan Lerch 07 Aug '14

07 Aug '14

Hi all, After the success that was Jiří's coverage of GUADEC, i have been looking at the incoming links from other websites, and it seems that the majority of incoming links to his posts were for coverage on a particular talk. So, my idea here would be to do individual posts for each of the talks that we are going to cover at FLOCK. This approach will also make it easier to assign a specific talk to a writer so we don't have multiple people covering the same talk. I have created a draft wikipage here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing/FlockCoverageOnFMAG to track who will be covering what. I have also added a few guidelines for the content at the top, but this is really just me throwing out a few ideas, so feel free to change / remove anything from there. Also, do we want to prefix (or postfix) each post title with a tagline (maybe "[FLOCK 2014]:") or something so its clear what the post is about? cheers, ryanlerch

7 13

RE: FLOCK coverage idea
by Madhurjya Roy 07 Aug '14

07 Aug '14

I was going to suggest the same! Briefing out each day could be a great idea. Small posts with summary and resolution (if any) of each talk can really help people track the conference on a daily basis. Madhurjya Roy (madhurjyaroy) -----Original Message----- From: "Máirín Duffy" <duffy(a)fedoraproject.org> Sent: ‎06-‎08-‎2014 19:33 To: "jzb(a)redhat.com" <jzb(a)redhat.com>; "Fedora Marketing team" <marketing(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>; "Matthew Miller" <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> Subject: Re: FLOCK coverage idea On 08/06/2014 10:00 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 08/06/2014 03:54 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 03:48:43PM +0200, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >>>> So, my idea here would be to do individual posts for each of the talks >>>> that we are going to cover at FLOCK. This approach will also make it >>>> easier to assign a specific talk to a writer so we don't have multiple >>>> people covering the same talk. >>> How do we feel about combining a few talks into one post? >>> I attended the keynote, a talk on QA and a talk on Copr so far today. >>> Already wrote up the keynote, but not sure I'm going to get a full post >>> out of the QA talk. Any strong objections to doing a post that looks at >>> more than one talk? >> >> I think combining them if they're related makes sense, but it's better to >> not combine QA and Coprs even if each result is short. (Headline the QA talk >> with the quote about Rawhide bugs _probably_ not being a demonic hand >> reaching out of the monitor to strangle you?) > > I must have missed that bit. I was thinking if we combine coverage we > might draw more attention to talks than shorter individual posts, but > whatever. I did combos last year.... basically I did a brief synopsis for every talk, one blog post per day. Got really good coverage and every post got LWN coverage. FWIW ~m -- marketing mailing list marketing(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

[MOVED TO DISCOURSE] Fedora Marketing - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/tag/marketing August 2014