From mspevack at redhat.com Fri Jun  5 05:53:00 2015
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1915828582483749947=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Max Spevack <mspevack at redhat.com>
To: marketing at lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: F13 (and onward) default bookmarks
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:53:22 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003151751520.6250@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: alpine.LFD.2.00.1003151746350.6250@localhost.localdomain

--===============1915828582483749947==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Max Spevack wrote:

> I assume that from a package ownership point of view, this is =

> virtually trivial?  Is there *anything* difficult about integrating =

> this package into the rest of Firefox & the distro, or is it really =

> basically the easiest package in all of Fedora to own, and could be =

> taken off of your hands entirely, thus freeing you of this =

> every-now-and-then ping?

Here's an actual question:

When I took the fedora-bookmarks.html page and removed some stale ones =

and added some new ones, I didn't worry about any of the metadata that =

went with the bookmarks.

Compare:

             <DT><A HREF=3D"http://fedoraproject.org/" =

ADD_DATE=3D"1158286779" LAST_VISIT=3D"1176675005" LAST_MODIFIED=3D"11766752=
85" =

LAST_CHARSET=3D"UTF-8" ID=3D"rdf:#$c7+Ar2">Fedora Project</A>
<DD>Home of the Fedora Project.

Versus:

             <DT><A HREF=3D"http://opensource.com/">OpenSource.com</A>
<DD>Open Source applied to the world.

How much does the metadata matter?

--Max

--===============1915828582483749947==--