From caillon at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 05:53:00 2015 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1858768704511246934==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Christopher Aillon To: marketing at lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: F13 (and onward) default bookmarks Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:01:14 -0700 Message-ID: <4B9ED85A.5090405@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: alpine.LFD.2.00.1003151751520.6250@localhost.localdomain --===============1858768704511246934== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/15/2010 02:53 PM, Max Spevack wrote: > On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Max Spevack wrote: > >> I assume that from a package ownership point of view, this is >> virtually trivial? Is there *anything* difficult about integrating >> this package into the rest of Firefox & the distro, or is it really >> basically the easiest package in all of Fedora to own, and could be >> taken off of your hands entirely, thus freeing you of this >> every-now-and-then ping? > > Here's an actual question: > > When I took the fedora-bookmarks.html page and removed some stale ones > and added some new ones, I didn't worry about any of the metadata that > went with the bookmarks. > > Compare: > >
LAST_VISIT=3D"1176675005" LAST_MODIFIED=3D"1176675285" LAST_CHARSET=3D"UT= F-8" > ID=3D"rdf:#$c7+Ar2">Fedora Project >
Home of the Fedora Project. > > Versus: > >
OpenSource.com >
Open Source applied to the world. > > How much does the metadata matter? Man, good question. I think that it might be required per the actual = spec, but I don't know how much it matters in practice. Anyway, it's = pretty easy to do things the way I outlined in my last mail, so I = typically just do it that way which adds all the needed tags, though I = do have to manually strip out the ICON ones... --===============1858768704511246934==--