[Marketing] PROPOSED Re: Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images

[Joe Brockmeier]

On 04/22/2016 11:58 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>  * I will expect Joe B from the Cloud WG to tell us authoritatively
>    through the *marketing* list exactly what should happen next, since
>    he (correctly) raised the issue of ensuring zero confusion over
>    publishing these articles.
>  
>  Ideally this should have been settled between Cloud WG and rel-eng
>  before an article was proposed.  But failing that, we shouldn't
>  schedule any Magazine post about changes in deliverables without
>  clearly knowing it's decided.  (To be fair, that seemed to be the case
>  for at least a week, until dgilmore raised an objection.)  Better
>  communication will fix similar problems in the future. 
Correct. This *was* decided, and then a question was raised. I don't
want to second-guess the second-guessing, because it was
well-intentioned and we're all communicating in like 15 different venues
and ... ugh. Communication is hard, kids.

I agree with Dusty's post earlier, I think we should stick with the
message that we are doing away with 32-bit cloud images irrespective of
other 32-bit images/etc. We don't at the moment have the resources, or
frankly interest, in doing much with 32-bit x86 cloud images.

I'm CC'ing Dennis directly in case cloud@ and marketing@ are not on his
"read immediately" list. :-)

WG folks: Please respond with a +1 or -1. Other votes welcome too.

Alternate proposals welcomed, but we should move quickly. Happy Friday.


-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/