On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 03:13:43 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <metherid(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> You might want to note two things. A) It is fully compatible with
> RHEL 6 and does not replace or conflict with anything in the base
> repository and that EPEL enforces this via a policy. B) This is a
> community repository and not commercially supported by Red Hat.
ok. How about a second paragraph that reads:
EPEL6 packages never replace RHEL6 packages, only build on them and
are fully compatible with RHEL6. EPEL is a community supported and
maintained project, and it's packages are not commercially supported by
Red Hat.
Or should that read better at the end?
I would suggest:
EPEL 6 packages is a complimentary and compatible add-on repository and
provides additional packages for RHEL 6 or compatible rebuilds and does not
replace any RHEL 6 packages. EPEL is a community project maintained and
supported by volunteers (via bugzilla and mailing lists) as part of the
Fedora Project and is not commercially supported by Red Hat.
Rahul