On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@scrye.com> wrote:

On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 03:13:43 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <metherid@gmail.com> wrote:

> You might want to note two things. A) It is fully compatible with
> RHEL 6 and does not replace or conflict with anything in the base
> repository and that EPEL enforces this via a policy. B) This is a
> community repository and not commercially supported by Red Hat.

ok. How about a second paragraph that reads:

EPEL6 packages never replace RHEL6 packages, only build on them and
are fully compatible with RHEL6. EPEL is a community supported and
maintained project, and it's packages are not commercially supported by
Red Hat.

Or should that read better at the end?

I would suggest:

EPEL 6 packages is a complimentary and compatible add-on repository and provides additional packages for RHEL 6 or compatible rebuilds and does not replace any RHEL 6 packages. EPEL is a community project maintained and supported by volunteers (via bugzilla and mailing lists) as part of the Fedora Project and is not commercially supported by Red Hat.

Rahul