Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:26 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:03 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
>>>>Developers have been
>>>>communicating that this release cycle was only for FC5 for quite a while
>>>Yeah, and it seems that was not enough.
>>Depends on where you get the information from. For example, distrowatch
>>corrected its previous misconception recently.
>That's not "official" -
What do you consider official?.
Me? If it is written somewhere on the fedora-webpages. A signed mail to
one of the mailinglists from a official person. A press-release.
But you should ask what is "official" for journalists or
How do we communicate all the official
information out there to make sure there isnt too many assumptions?
At least we *should clarify* wrong or unclear assumptions in the
community if they are floating around like this one.
How? Red Hat magazine? fedora.redhat.com? Wiki probably is not the best
place because I suspect some people don't trust the informations there.
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info>