Re: Logo -- yes, I dropped it ...
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 04:50 -0500, Patrick Barnes wrote:
This thread has already forked down that road and died. I BEG you
not
to rekindle that fire. See the thread "Re: Logo -- let's move on ...
the legal loophole of "Fedora(TM)" for Red Hat" for the whole
conversation.
Yes, I dropped it after Patrick was the first person who actually
addressed my statements, instead of assuming I was being argumentative.
I just had an "epiphany" in the middle of the "hat discussion."
I'm not going to comment further. And everyone needs to stop assuming I
don't have a very deep chronology of Red Hat's history. E.g., from an
old, work-in-progress FAQ (stopped writing last year):
http://www.geocities.com/thebs413/RH-Distribution-FAQ-3.html
http://www.geocities.com/thebs413/RH-Distribution-FAQ-4.html#ss4.3
That was based on my 1st hand experience of seeing many things. I'm
also working on a book entitled "Linux Configuration Management" which
focuses on FC/RHEL roll-outs.
--
Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith(a)ieee.org http://thebs413.blogspot.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The best things in life are NOT free - which is why life is easiest if
you save all the bills until you can share them with the perfect woman