On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 18:11, Colin Charles wrote:
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 10:15, Jeremy Hogan wrote:
> So we're finally giving Fedora significant prominence on
redhat.com.
www.redhat.com ?
Yep. Our site design is changing, and Fedora gets it's own upper level
nav. That gives a mini-home page for fedora, that positions it and sends
the user to
fedora.redhat.com.
Shouldn't the links be kept at the
fedora.redhat.com site? And
the new
URL that points there should be used, rather than keeping a few links
sitting on
www.redhat.com itself ?
Maybe, except I have zero direct control over
fedora.redhat.com, whereas
a traffic request let's me update
rh.com. Maybe instead of those sorts
of sites, a widget box that deep links into FAQs, Downloads, and
projects like the utility links in the upper right of
fedora.redhat.com.
> What should those sites be? These would be unofficially official (whilst
> still being officially unofficial), so they should be 4 or 5 sites we're
> the most comfortable pointing folks at.
Fedora Legacy -
www.fedoralegacy.org
Fedora Unofficial FAQ -
www.fedorafaq.org *
FedoraNEWS.ORG -
www.fedoranews.org
FedoraForums -
www.fedoraforums.org
* - should we start taking the effort to getting the Fedora Docs project
to organise the FAQ, i.e. we consolidate it to our main site at
fedora.redhat.com ?
Yeah, whatever makes us most comfortable with pointing users there.
Also, from a usability standpoint, a newbie might go, "what's a FAQ?".
So we should try "Frequently Asked Questions" as a link on the main site
(rather than unofficial FAQ)...
Yeah, the links have space for text explaining them.
--jeremy