Re: Feedback from Distrowatch

[Aks]

On 05/09/2012 03:16 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
>  ----- "Danishka Navin" <danishka(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:06 AM, inode0 < inode0(a)gmail.com > wrote:
> >
> > If it is confused with other logos from a similar product space then
> > it isn't perfect. It may well be no fault of the logo but it is a
> > problem.
> >
> > If a lot of someones think it is related to Facebook then it is a
> > problem worth thinking about before it gets completely out of control.
> > We have seen other hints that this confusion exists in the past as
> > well.
> >
> > Admitting we have a brand problem which seems to be related to some
> > similar aspects that exist in our logo and in Facebook's logo doesn't
> > mean we need to abandon our logo. Are there other ways available to us
> > to mitigate this confusion? Perhaps advertising Fedora more widely so
> > more people are exposed to our brand more often? Perhaps something
> > else?
> >
> > it would be great if we could identify the region/location of those
> > people.
> > but there is no such information i guess.
> >
> > I think we should increase our presence in the social media specially
> > in Facebook itself.
> >
>  Maybe it's something that Red Hat legal should have handled years ago and
> didn't?
>
>  -- Bob 
Fedora Logo has a long established base, and changing the logo would not
be a good decision in my opinion.

-- 
Abhishek Singh
FOSS Nepal Community
http://wiki.fossnepal.org