Thanks :D (For this one, and a zillion others you have helped with as well!)

That's an interesting thought - I don't know that we've consciously done that before, though perhaps some folks did such rearranging without really calling that out.

Just to clarify (I didn't really quite get what you meant at first - when you said "developer tool" i thought you meant whatever section was dedicated to developer tools, not the actual "Developer's Assistant" tool/feature): The idea here is that for each section/grouping of new features/highlights, call out features that are more Fedora specific *first*, and then highlight features that are not necessarily Fedora-native/born/specific second. Unless it's popular, in which case... use your discretion? :)

It would be nice to document this somewhere - it seems like at the minimum putting it in the template (which doesn't actually exist, but could!) as an admon note could be useful, or perhaps fleshing out the Alpha announcement SOP / revisiting the beta/final announcement SOPs (which look fairly dated right now) to add this might be a good idea. 

-r