On Wednesday 29 March 2006 21:49, Max Spevack wrote:
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Clair wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 March 2006 21:30, Max Spevack wrote:
>> Is it really special treatment? Special treatment, in my mind, would be
>> putting a vendor to the top of the list because they offered us a
>> kickback. Special treatment implies "shady dealings". I don't
see this
>> proposal as being special treatment at all. Karlie is voluteering to
>> offer a service that *none* of the other vendors are offering, and we
>> are acknowledging that. It's not like she is the *only* vendor who can
>> do this. Wouldn't it be wonderful if all of our vendors believed so
>> strongly in Fedora that they wanted to do the same thing?
>
> Ah, but until recently one of the vendors was also giving away free
> media.
I did not know that. In what way did we differentiate them from the other
vendors who were not?
I put 'free' under "price".
Clair