On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 03:13:43 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <metherid(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You might want to note two things. A) It is fully compatible with
RHEL 6 and does not replace or conflict with anything in the base
repository and that EPEL enforces this via a policy. B) This is a
community repository and not commercially supported by Red Hat.
ok. How about a second paragraph that reads:
EPEL6 packages never replace RHEL6 packages, only build on them and
are fully compatible with RHEL6. EPEL is a community supported and
maintained project, and it's packages are not commercially supported by
Red Hat.
Or should that read better at the end?
Thanks for the feedback!
kevin