Re: Logos: everybody wants one but nobody seems to have any constructive comments. (was Re: Cool Fedora schwag idea)

[Jef Spaleta]

On 6/30/05, Matt Frye  wrote:
> I agree.  While Jeremy's comments make *a lot* of sense, when I
> picture the Fedora fedora, I think about it's connection to Red Hat,
> but also it's distinct difference.  It's akin to auto designers'
> notion of "DNA."  Here's my mental picture made png:
> http://mattfrye.net/fedora_mpf.png

Ah.. but how do you work in the subcomponent differences in the bare "hat"?
Certainly Fedora Legacy would like to use the base logo but be able to
add something to it to denote "legacy" at a glance.  The same with
Extras or Core  or even differentiating the foundation from the
distribution.

-jef