On 08/06/2014 03:54 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 03:48:43PM +0200, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> So, my idea here would be to do individual posts for each of the talks
>> that we are going to cover at FLOCK. This approach will also make it
>> easier to assign a specific talk to a writer so we don't have multiple
>> people covering the same talk.
> How do we feel about combining a few talks into one post?
> I attended the keynote, a talk on QA and a talk on Copr so far today.
> Already wrote up the keynote, but not sure I'm going to get a full post
> out of the QA talk. Any strong objections to doing a post that looks at
> more than one talk?
I think combining them if they're related makes sense, but it's better to
not combine QA and Coprs even if each result is short. (Headline the QA talk
with the quote about Rawhide bugs _probably_ not being a demonic hand
reaching out of the monitor to strangle you?)
I must have missed that bit. I was thinking if we combine coverage we
might draw more attention to talks than shorter individual posts, but
whatever.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst
jzb(a)redhat.com |
http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb |
http://dissociatedpress.net/