On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 01:04:00PM -0400, Ryan Lerch wrote:
On 09/11/2014 12:26 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>On 09/11/2014 09:15 AM, Ryan Lerch wrote:
>>Just going to throw a time out here -- what do people think of UTC 1400
>>- UTC1500 as a time of day for a meeting?
>>We can pick any day really.
>That's 9 a.m. my time, so - kinda works. I have a lot of meetings from 8
>a.m. to 11 a.m. depending on the day of week, but I can usually keep an
>eyeball on IRC if I'm at the desk.
>
>I'm fine with the idea of a meeting, but I'd also note - there's nothing
>to stop people from pitching ideas on the mailing list 24/7.
No nothing at all, except we rarely get pitches on the list even though it
is known that it happens this way. The idea of a standalone meeting is to
hopefully get people to collate a few thoughts, then get them to pitch them
as ideas in the brainstorm session. Maybe not the way a "traditional" pitch
works.
How about we set up a trial time, see how it goes, and fold back in
with the regular Marketing meeting if it's not long or energetic
enough to demand a separate session? (And reconsider that
periodically as needed, seeing as how it might start off robust and
then flatten later.)
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow:
http://opensource.com