You&#39;re welcome, anytime. Sorry if I sounded too harsh or something. <div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers, </div><div>Sylvia </div><div><br><br>On Thursday, 9 June 2016, Justin W. Flory &lt;<a href="mailto:jflory7@gmail.com">jflory7@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 06/08/2016 08:30 PM, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I just said about an image because this way the article looks a bit<br>
boring at first sight.<br>
It was just that.<br>
<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Sylvia<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Hey Sylvia,<br>
<br>
We&#39;ll definitely be sure to add in some more images (both featured image and screenshots) to liven it up a bit. I know jhogarth said he was working on screenshots, and we should be able to pull together a featured image fairly easily for this (from past releases).<br>
<br>
It also looks like we might have an extra week to work on prettying up too, since F24 might slip another week. Thanks for the feedback! :)<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
On Wednesday, 8 June 2016, Justin W. Flory &lt;<a>jflory7@gmail.com</a><br>
&lt;mailto:<a>jflory7@gmail.com</a>&gt;&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
    On 06/08/2016 03:48 PM, James Hogarth wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
        On 8 Jun 2016 19:30, &quot;Sylvia Sánchez&quot; &lt;<a>lailahfsf@gmail.com</a><br>
        &lt;mailto:<a>lailahfsf@gmail.com</a>&gt;&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
            Hi Justin!<br>
<br>
            I would say it needs an image or two.  Besides that, I find<br>
            it perfect.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
        The last I recall from the previous editorial meeting is that the<br>
        graphical update method would not be highlighted as a primary<br>
        supported<br>
        update and would at best be a &quot;this thing is coming soon&quot; target...<br>
<br>
        Then a later more detailed article would be published to<br>
        coincide with<br>
        FESCO being happy with that as a supported update method.<br>
<br>
        We should check with FESCO on this before publishing as nirik<br>
        was pretty<br>
        clear I thought that we should not publish such an article until<br>
        they<br>
        give the go ahead.<br>
<br>
<br>
    Hey James, I thought the decision would be to highlight this for<br>
    upgrading as long as it was ready, tested, tried, and true. In<br>
    either case, including this method in the article is completely<br>
    dependent on the FESCo decision, and in the event that it is not<br>
    ready in time for release, we will modify and strip this part of the<br>
    article out.<br>
<br>
    We definitely will not publish this method unless we have a clear<br>
    answer from FESCo and can be assured that the large majority of<br>
    users will be able to upgrade using this method successfully. For<br>
    now, the way the article is structured, it will be easy to remove<br>
    this method if it isn&#39;t ready.<br>
<br>
    --<br>
    Cheers,<br>
    Justin W. Flory<br>
    <a>jflory7@gmail.com</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
--<br>
Cheers,<br>
Justin W. Flory<br>
<a>jflory7@gmail.com</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>