8:44 a.m.
Feel free to wiki-fy as you please. I'll be online in a bit; trying
to get my body to convert caffeine into energy first :)
-robyn
On 2/15/10, Paul W. Frields <stickster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 02:53:11AM -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
> In the marketing meeting / post-meeting SOP discussion last week, the
> timeline was decided of putting out a "call for participation" on the
> Talking Points on either Friday or Monday. Since it is now Monday,
> we need to do it today :) Which means we need to (1) finalize the SOP,
> (2) send out the email to the appropriate lists.
>
> Ryan Rix and I worked up the Talking Points SOP this evening /
> morning. A (very) rough draft is up at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talking_points_SOP. (We were both
> pretty tired but decided to knock out a first go at it; there is
> probably some good content missing from what we discussed in last
> week's marketing meeting, and post-marketing-meeting Talking Points
> SOP discussion. Eyeballs! Feedback! Please!)
>
> If anyone is around in the morning (7am Pacific, 10am Eastern, ish) -
> I will be online finishing the editing on the SOP and sending out the
> email CFP on F13 Talking Points. If anyone wants to hop on and help,
> that would be AWESOME - or feel free to contribute on the wiki page if
> you get to it before I do. One thing I would like to add to the SOP
> (since I just thought of it 3 seconds ago!) is the content of the
> email to be sent out requesting participation in Talking Points
> development. If someone would like to jump in and do that, that would
> be great.
The page looks great. I think you can also find some helpful
information on the [[Category:Talking Points]] page that will help
fill in "how to choose points." In fact, I'd be in favor of removing
a bunch of that material from the Category page, and just linking back
to the [[Talking points SOP]], to avoid duplication of content (and
confusion about where the governing stuff is).
> Finally, the other thing discussed in the marketing meeting was that
> we should pre-populate the F13 Talking Points page with some items as
> a point to start from. A number of community members have already
> jumped in and done some filling in the blanks there, so I think we
> have a sufficient starting point to go from - but feel free to jump in
> and add anything that is missing. The F13 Talking Points page is at
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Talking_Points.
>
> David Ramsey did an awesome job filling in some of the proposed
> Talking Points, and Ryan mailed him earlier this evening / morning to
> see if he would be interested in talking with us about how / why he
> picked his proposed Talking Points, so we can add some of that
> information to the SOP. I don't think this part of the SOP
> necessarily needs to be finished prior to us requesting Talking Point
> proposals, but I think it would be insightful to other community
> members. David said he'd be happy to talk with us about it, so I'd
> just like to say, THANKS DAVID! - and hopefully we can synchronize on
> that soon.
I have some changes I'd like to propose to the talking points that are
on the page now, should I just edit the wiki?
Desktop users/everyone:
* I'd include the state of free video drivers (esp. start of 3D
support in nouveau) here. That's a huge story that we need to drive
home, because so many people say that 3D support is what keeps them
on a proprietary NVidia driver.
* The new user account dialog is a big step forward in usability and
deserves some love. I'd combine this with color management and
NetworkManager upgrades as "general desktop improvements."
Sysadmins:
* What about Zarafa being available, which is the first complete
groupware (mail/calendar/etc.) solution available in Fedora?
* NFS features need to be combined.
* I'd advocate for removing the SSSD listing because of the difficulty
of explaining the impact to a lay press reader, and because this
change will not affect many people.
* NFS and the btrfs rollback feature need to be explained in simple
terms, or else dropped off the list.
Developers:
* IntelliJ IDEA and NetBeans could be combined as general "You can
find this package in Fedora 13" features.
* The Python 3 feature should be expanded to include the better Python
debugging features in Fedora 13, which will affect many devs using
both Python 2.6.x and Python 3.
Finally, I think we discussed reserving a section in the talking
points for new spins. This time around we're premiering the Fedora
Moblin(tm) Desktop Edition and Sugar on a Stick.
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com
--
marketing mailing list
marketing(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
--
Sent from my mobile device