On 02/07/2016 07:25 PM, Neville A. Cross wrote:
On Sun, February 7, 2016 4:17 pm, Justin W. Flory wrote:
> On 02/07/2016 04:58 PM, charles profitt wrote:
>
>> I did not want to change the substance in the article written by
>> William, but I think the language could be softened.
>>
>>
>> ---- current ----
>> Neville has a love-hate relationship with GNOME. All of his computers
>> have it. The hate part comes from the changing nature of GNOME. The
>> developers move functionality and do not do a good job of documenting
>> where that feature went. Cross makes special note that the most annoying
>> item is the “connect to server� function in Nautilus ----
>>
>>
>> ---- possible revision ----
>> Neville has a love-hate relationship with GNOME. While all of his
>> computer run Ghome there are times when his productivity is impacted due
>> to changes in where features are located. One example is the connect to
>> server function in Nautilus. Neville believes that the issue could
>> easily be resolved with better documentation with regards to changes.
>> ----
>>
>>
>> I think this keeps the substance roughly the same, but makes the
>> message a bit more subtle.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>
> I'm personally +1 to this proposed revision. I think this is a better
> compromise while still maintaining the original point intended by Neville.
>
>
> Let's see if this sounds okay to Neville.
>
I am in a rural area with bad coverage and even worse data on my cell.
I keep using gnome because is what Fedora has as primary focus. As
ambassador I represent fedora and therefore I need to be able to talk to
people about gnome and show that it comes fluid, I am not guessing. Now is
workstation and I feel that is it expected to endorse it as ambassador.
Specially when everybody else in the local community is ditching gnome for
various different reasons.
So, if you want to scratch all that and just write that I use wirkstation,
it if fine by me.
The rewording is very good. If you want to keep some of the balanced view,
I think it is very diplomatic.
Thanks for reviewing my interview.
Neville
Thanks for chiming in Neville -- with the above in mind, I believe using
Charles' revision will be best.
--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory
jflory7(a)gmail.com