Hey Kamil,
Thanks for the information. I didn't get a chance to update the article earlier today, but I just added these edits to the article. They should be visible now.
http://fedoramagazine.org/upgrading-from-fedora-22-to-fedora-23/
Let me know if these changes look alright to you. Thanks again for the pointers.
-- Cheers, Justin W. Flory jflory7@fedoraproject.org
On 11/09/2015 11:29 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
Hello Justin,
I'm from Fedora QA and I'm writing regarding http://fedoramagazine.org/upgrading-from-fedora-22-to-fedora-23/
Could you please make a few adjustments to that article?
- --best should no longer be necessary with latest system-upgrade (0.7), we try to minimize the chance of upgrading just a half of your system. I have to admit I'm not actually sure whether there are or not some cases where it can make a difference, but I think we should be quite OK without recommending it by default.
- --allowerasing should definitely be mentioned, it will be needed if some package needs to be removed (e.g. retired package or with broken deps, most likely third party)
- we have a bug in dnf regarding certain locales like Chinese and Japanese. Can you please point people to a workaround here? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F23_bugs#system-upgrade-locale
I can put all of that into comments under that article, but most people won't notice it. It would be much better if it was in the article :)
Thanks, Kamil
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org