10:37 a.m.
Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on something
from Red Hat Legal.
What exactly are we blocking on?
--Max
10:39 a.m.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack <mspevack(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on
something from
Red Hat Legal.
What exactly are we blocking on?
--Max
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
release forms
10:52 a.m.
Hmm, looking here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing/Tasks
I don't see that reflected. Who's got the ball?
--g
(p.s. I just removed my name from the "Four Foundations" music video.
Would be fun, but not high on my priority list right now.)
--
Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer!
[[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]]
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, David Nalley wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack
<mspevack(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on something from
> Red Hat Legal.
>
> What exactly are we blocking on?
>
> --Max
>
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>
release forms
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
11:04 a.m.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Greg Dekoenigsberg <gdk(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hmm, looking here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing/Tasks
I don't see that reflected. Who's got the ball?
--g
(p.s. I just removed my name from the "Four Foundations" music video. Would
be fun, but not high on my priority list right now.)
--
Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer!
[[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]]
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack <mspevack(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on something
>> from
>> Red Hat Legal.
>>
>> What exactly are we blocking on?
>>
>> --Max
>>
>> --
>> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
>> Fedora-marketing-list(a)redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>>
>
> release forms
>
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
Per this message it's spot:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2009-January/msg000...
Though someone was tasked with following up on this at the last
meeting I attended and I don't recall who that was, and I don't see
meeting minutes anywhere.
1:01 a.m.
David Nalley wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack wrote:
>>> Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on something
>>> from Red Hat Legal.
>>>
>>> What exactly are we blocking on?
Per this message it's spot:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2009-January/msg000...
Yes, that is. We have to hunt people and ask for signatures. And as we
don't know what to ask for, we have to wait.
Though someone was tasked with following up on this at the last
meeting I attended and I don't recall who that was, and I don't see
meeting minutes anywhere.
--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
11:39 a.m.
I tried to get in contact with spot and was unsuccessful the past two
days. Either way, I would like to say that I now have the ball on this
and will make sure it gets done ASAP.
Thanks,
Jack
Nicu Buculei wrote:
David Nalley wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack wrote:
>>>> Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on
>>>> something
>>>> from Red Hat Legal.
>>>>
>>>> What exactly are we blocking on?
>
> Per this message it's spot:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2009-January/msg000...
>
Yes, that is. We have to hunt people and ask for signatures. And as we
don't know what to ask for, we have to wait.
> Though someone was tasked with following up on this at the last
> meeting I attended and I don't recall who that was, and I don't see
> meeting minutes anywhere.
11:52 a.m.
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 12:39:47PM -0500, Jack Aboutboul wrote:
Nicu Buculei wrote:
> David Nalley wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack wrote:
>>>>> Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on
>>>>> something
>>>>> from Red Hat Legal.
>>>>>
>>>>> What exactly are we blocking on?
>>
>> Per this message it's spot:
>>
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2009-January/msg000...
>
> Yes, that is. We have to hunt people and ask for signatures. And as we
> don't know what to ask for, we have to wait.
>
>> Though someone was tasked with following up on this at the last
>> meeting I attended and I don't recall who that was, and I don't see
>> meeting minutes anywhere.
I tried to get in contact with spot and was unsuccessful the past two
days. Either way, I would like to say that I now have the ball on this
and will make sure it gets done ASAP.
Cool. Spot is at FOSDEM right now. Based on how things go at shows,
I bet he'll be in emergency-triage mode for email for a while, so the
delay's understandable.
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
12:29 p.m.
Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 12:39:47PM -0500, Jack Aboutboul wrote:
> Nicu Buculei wrote:
>
>> David Nalley wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on
>>>>>> something
>>>>>> from Red Hat Legal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What exactly are we blocking on?
>>>>>>
>>> Per this message it's spot:
>>>
>>>
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2009-January/msg000...
>>>
>> Yes, that is. We have to hunt people and ask for signatures. And as we
>> don't know what to ask for, we have to wait.
>>
>>
>>> Though someone was tasked with following up on this at the last
>>> meeting I attended and I don't recall who that was, and I don't see
>>> meeting minutes anywhere.
>>>
> I tried to get in contact with spot and was unsuccessful the past two
> days. Either way, I would like to say that I now have the ball on this
> and will make sure it gets done ASAP.
>
Cool. Spot is at FOSDEM right now. Based on how things go at shows,
I bet he'll be in emergency-triage mode for email for a while, so the
delay's understandable.
Didnt realize that, that could explain the delay. I will try and
contact him next week and see if I can officially take this off his plate.
Jack
1:18 p.m.
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 01:29:13PM -0500, Jack Aboutboul wrote:
Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 12:39:47PM -0500, Jack Aboutboul wrote:
>
>> Nicu Buculei wrote:
>>
>>> David Nalley wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on
>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>> from Red Hat Legal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What exactly are we blocking on?
>>>>>>>
>>>> Per this message it's spot:
>>>>
>>>>
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2009-January/msg000...
>>>>
>>> Yes, that is. We have to hunt people and ask for signatures. And as
>>> we don't know what to ask for, we have to wait.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Though someone was tasked with following up on this at the last
>>>> meeting I attended and I don't recall who that was, and I don't
see
>>>> meeting minutes anywhere.
>>>>
>> I tried to get in contact with spot and was unsuccessful the past two
>> days. Either way, I would like to say that I now have the ball on
>> this and will make sure it gets done ASAP.
>>
>
> Cool. Spot is at FOSDEM right now. Based on how things go at shows,
> I bet he'll be in emergency-triage mode for email for a while, so the
> delay's understandable.
>
>
Didnt realize that, that could explain the delay. I will try and contact
him next week and see if I can officially take this off his plate.
Since Spot is the primary contact point for legal, i.e. the "Fedora
Legal" coordinator, why don't we allow him to chase this down. But he
should communicate the status to you if you're minding the Picture
Book project from the high level.
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
2:19 p.m.
Paul W. Frields wrote:
Since Spot is the primary contact point for legal, i.e. the
"Fedora
Legal" coordinator, why don't we allow him to chase this down. But he
should communicate the status to you if you're minding the Picture
Book project from the high level.
So let it be written, so let it be done....
Thanks,
Jack
10:45 p.m.
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 03:19:24PM -0500, Jack Aboutboul wrote:
Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Since Spot is the primary contact point for legal, i.e. the "Fedora
> Legal" coordinator, why don't we allow him to chase this down. But he
> should communicate the status to you if you're minding the Picture
> Book project from the high level.
>
>
So let it be written, so let it be done....
All I know is that we're waiting on RH Legal to write up an acceptable
release form that can be used for this project (something more broad
than the release forms used at FUDConF11; those were temporary).
We block on that. Then we can start the picture uploading.
--
Ian Weller <ianweller(a)gmail.com> http://ianweller.org
GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36
"Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet."
~ Douglas Adams
2:14 p.m.
On 2009-02-06 at 23:45:29 -0500, Ian Weller <ianweller(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 03:19:24PM -0500, Jack Aboutboul wrote:
> Paul W. Frields wrote:
>> Since Spot is the primary contact point for legal, i.e. the "Fedora
>> Legal" coordinator, why don't we allow him to chase this down. But he
>> should communicate the status to you if you're minding the Picture
>> Book project from the high level.
>>
>>
> So let it be written, so let it be done....
>
All I know is that we're waiting on RH Legal to write up an acceptable
release form that can be used for this project (something more broad
than the release forms used at FUDConF11; those were temporary).
We block on that. Then we can start the picture uploading.
I've poked RH Legal again, hopefully they will either give us something
or an ETA on when we can expect it.
~spot
2:28 p.m.
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 03:14:50PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 2009-02-06 at 23:45:29 -0500, Ian Weller
<ianweller(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> All I know is that we're waiting on RH Legal to write up an acceptable
> release form that can be used for this project (something more broad
> than the release forms used at FUDConF11; those were temporary).
>
> We block on that. Then we can start the picture uploading.
I've poked RH Legal again, hopefully they will either give us something
or an ETA on when we can expect it.
Thanks again, spot.
--
Ian Weller <ianweller(a)gmail.com> http://ianweller.org
GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36
"Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet."
~ Douglas Adams
5550
days inactive
5552
days old
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
12 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
David Nalley -
Greg DeKoenigsberg -
Ian Weller -
Jack Aboutboul -
Max Spevack -
Nicu Buculei -
Paul W. Frields -
Tom Callaway