Adding the Fedora Marketing team to this discussion.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Samalik" asamalik@redhat.com To: developer-portal@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, websites@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Pavel Valena" pvalena@redhat.com Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 7:39:11 AM Subject: Preparing a new release of Fedora Developer Portal - asking for feedback
Hello Everyone,
we have prepared a new release of Fedora Developer Portal, and we would like to hear your feedback before pushing it into production. If everything goes fine, we would like to make the release on Monday, April 25th.
This email is the first of its kind. I would like to send it every time before release - to make sure, that we involve everyone who might be interested. This time, I have also cc-ed 'websites' and 'devel' lists. All future emails about new releases will go to the 'developer-portal' mailing list only.
Current version: https://developer.fedoraproject.org/ New release in staging: https://developer.stg.fedoraproject.org/
What's new:
- Design
- refreshed look with more uniform layout
- images in the header have been compressed
- 'Edit this page' button on every page
- clicking this button gets you to the github repo, where you can edit the
content directly in your web browser and submit a pull-request
- Including empty pages
- pages are shown with 'help needed' badge
- goal of this is to encourage people/make it easier to contribute content
- Start section
- including guides about Arduino and mobile applications using Google Android
Studio
- Share your knowledge banner on each page
- with link to our contributing guides: https://developer-portal.github.io/
- Using Google Analytics
- disabled 'demographics and interest reports'
- disabled 'enhanced link attribution'
- disabled 'remarketing'
- disabled 'advertising reporting features'
- basically, I want to use it only to track views and to see what is most
popular
I welcome any feedback or comments.
Thank you! Have a great day, Adam Samalik
--
Adam Šamalík
Associate Software Engineer Red Hat
-- websites mailing list websites@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
This might also be interesting for Docs people.
--Pete
On 04/20/2016 12:52 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
This might also be interesting for Docs people.
How can we have these sorts of conversations without the multi-list problem?
There are several discussions that ought to involve marketing, docs, design, etc. We definitely need to remove barriers to communications here.
Best,
jzb
2016-04-20 18:53 GMT+02:00 Joe Brockmeier jzb@redhat.com:
On 04/20/2016 12:52 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
This might also be interesting for Docs people.
How can we have these sorts of conversations without the multi-list problem?
There are several discussions that ought to involve marketing, docs, design, etc. We definitely need to remove barriers to communications here.
Best,
jzb
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi Adam, not sure where my reply passes and where not (I'm not subscribed to any ML), but:
Does the update also include I18n? The developer portal is somewhere in between websites and Infra, so if you consider to add this too, you probably need to create and push the source file to Zanata. Or is this a plan for further releases?
Hi Robert,
the update does not include I18n. Using it is not on our plan - but that doesn't mean we don't want it. We just didn't think about it. If you want to help us with it, I will be more than happy to have it. But I'm not sure how it would work with all the content. Especially in terms of contributing.
Adam
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Robert Mayr robyduck@fedoraproject.org wrote:
2016-04-20 18:53 GMT+02:00 Joe Brockmeier jzb@redhat.com:
On 04/20/2016 12:52 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
This might also be interesting for Docs people.
How can we have these sorts of conversations without the multi-list problem?
There are several discussions that ought to involve marketing, docs, design, etc. We definitely need to remove barriers to communications here.
Best,
jzb
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi Adam, not sure where my reply passes and where not (I'm not subscribed to any ML), but:
Does the update also include I18n? The developer portal is somewhere in between websites and Infra, so if you consider to add this too, you probably need to create and push the source file to Zanata. Or is this a plan for further releases?
-- Robert Mayr (robyduck)
Developer-portal mailing list developer-portal@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/developer-portal@lists.fedoraproj...
Hi Robert,
I guess, developer portal should be only in English. Many developer documentation are in English, like Python, Perl, Ruby.
Regards Petr
On 04/21/2016 07:54 PM, Adam Samalik wrote:
Hi Robert,
the update does not include I18n. Using it is not on our plan - but that doesn't mean we don't want it. We just didn't think about it. If you want to help us with it, I will be more than happy to have it. But I'm not sure how it would work with all the content. Especially in terms of contributing.
Adam
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Robert Mayr <robyduck@fedoraproject.org mailto:robyduck@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
2016-04-20 18:53 GMT+02:00 Joe Brockmeier <jzb@redhat.com <mailto:jzb@redhat.com>>: On 04/20/2016 12:52 PM, Pete Travis wrote: > This might also be interesting for Docs people. > How can we have these sorts of conversations without the multi-list problem? There are several discussions that ought to involve marketing, docs, design, etc. We definitely need to remove barriers to communications here. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb@redhat.com <mailto:jzb@redhat.com> | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Hi Adam, not sure where my reply passes and where not (I'm not subscribed to any ML), but: Does the update also include I18n? The developer portal is somewhere in between websites and Infra, so if you consider to add this too, you probably need to create and push the source file to Zanata. Or is this a plan for further releases? -- Robert Mayr (robyduck) _______________________________________________ Developer-portal mailing list developer-portal@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:developer-portal@lists.fedoraproject.org> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/developer-portal@lists.fedoraproject.org--
Adam Šamalík
Associate Software Engineer Red Hat
-- websites mailing list websites@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
Ok, I'm fine with that. I was just bringing up a question we discussed time ago and I'm asked sometimes by L10n folks. Thanks for confirming it. Regards. Robert
2016-04-22 8:35 GMT+02:00 Petr Hracek phracek@redhat.com:
Hi Robert,
I guess, developer portal should be only in English. Many developer documentation are in English, like Python, Perl, Ruby.
Regards Petr
On 04/21/2016 07:54 PM, Adam Samalik wrote:
Hi Robert,
the update does not include I18n. Using it is not on our plan - but that doesn't mean we don't want it. We just didn't think about it. If you want to help us with it, I will be more than happy to have it. But I'm not sure how it would work with all the content. Especially in terms of contributing.
Adam
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Robert Mayr robyduck@fedoraproject.org wrote:
2016-04-20 18:53 GMT+02:00 Joe Brockmeier < jzb@redhat.com jzb@redhat.com>:
On 04/20/2016 12:52 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
This might also be interesting for Docs people.
How can we have these sorts of conversations without the multi-list problem?
There are several discussions that ought to involve marketing, docs, design, etc. We definitely need to remove barriers to communications here.
Best,
jzb
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi Adam, not sure where my reply passes and where not (I'm not subscribed to any ML), but:
Does the update also include I18n? The developer portal is somewhere in between websites and Infra, so if you consider to add this too, you probably need to create and push the source file to Zanata. Or is this a plan for further releases?
-- Robert Mayr (robyduck)
Developer-portal mailing list developer-portal@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/developer-portal@lists.fedoraproj...
--
Adam Šamalík
Associate Software Engineer Red Hat
-- websites mailing listwebsites@lists.fedoraproject.orghttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob: +420777056169 email: phracek@redhat.com
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 08:35:57AM +0200, Petr Hracek wrote:
I guess, developer portal should be only in English. Many developer documentation are in English, like Python, Perl, Ruby.
If people are interested in working on it, though, having non-English intro pages might bring more people into Fedora.
I think this developer portal will be key for us, and there is a place for a developer hub for projects aka earlier fedora hosted. IMHO Fedora Hosted .next should be something like a kickstart portal, just for softwares. If we are able to our community run software startups, host them, and even besides the description would be cool to openly, visibly look for specified coders, designers and so on.
Z
2016-04-27 20:22 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller mattdm@fedoraproject.org:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 08:35:57AM +0200, Petr Hracek wrote:
I guess, developer portal should be only in English. Many developer documentation are in English, like Python, Perl, Ruby.
If people are interested in working on it, though, having non-English intro pages might bring more people into Fedora.
-- Matthew Miller mattdm@fedoraproject.org Fedora Project Leader -- marketing mailing list marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:53:44PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On 04/20/2016 12:52 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
This might also be interesting for Docs people.
How can we have these sorts of conversations without the multi-list problem?
There are several discussions that ought to involve marketing, docs, design, etc. We definitely need to remove barriers to communications here.
There's a lightly used list called logistics@ that was originally intended to allow contributors from multiple teams to have a discussion concerning all involved without cross posting.
On 04/21/2016 08:57 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:53:44PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On 04/20/2016 12:52 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
This might also be interesting for Docs people.
How can we have these sorts of conversations without the multi-list problem?
There are several discussions that ought to involve marketing, docs, design, etc. We definitely need to remove barriers to communications here.
There's a lightly used list called logistics@ that was originally intended to allow contributors from multiple teams to have a discussion concerning all involved without cross posting.
Interesting. I wonder what the odds are of persuading the interested parties to subscribe there?
That would be a nice solution.
On Thursday, 21 April 2016, Joe Brockmeier jzb@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/21/2016 08:57 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:53:44PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On 04/20/2016 12:52 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
This might also be interesting for Docs people.
How can we have these sorts of conversations without the multi-list
problem?
There are several discussions that ought to involve marketing, docs, design, etc. We definitely need to remove barriers to communications
here.
There's a lightly used list called logistics@ that was originally intended to allow contributors from multiple teams to have a discussion concerning all involved without cross posting.
Interesting. I wonder what the odds are of persuading the interested parties to subscribe there? -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb@redhat.com javascript:; | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 08:59:23AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
There's a lightly used list called logistics@ that was originally intended to allow contributors from multiple teams to have a discussion concerning all involved without cross posting.
Interesting. I wonder what the odds are of persuading the interested parties to subscribe there?
Sooooo, https://xkcd.com/927/ but with mailing lists. :)
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 08:57:16AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
There's a lightly used list called logistics@ that was originally intended to allow contributors from multiple teams to have a discussion concerning all involved without cross posting.
Huh. Since the list has no description, I always just assumed that it was about coordinating shipping and things like that.
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org