marketing tickets private?

[Máirín Duffy]

Hi,

I tried to view a link to a marketing team ticket and was given an error 
message that marketing team tickets are private and require login / 
privileges to view.

Why is this? A lot of the other Fedora trac tickets I use (eg 
design-team, badges) are public to read.

~m

[Joe Brockmeier]

On 07/28/2015 02:06 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>  Hi,
>  
>  I tried to view a link to a marketing team ticket and was given an error
>  message that marketing team tickets are private and require login /
>  privileges to view.
>  
>  Why is this? A lot of the other Fedora trac tickets I use (eg
>  design-team, badges) are public to read. 
You wouldn't want marketing to reach everybody, would you?

Oh, wait...

Um, seriously - no idea. They should be public. I don't think there's
many instances where we need a private ticket for marketing.

Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/

[Matthew Miller]

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 02:22:23PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>  Um, seriously - no idea. They should be public. I don't think
> there's
>  many instances where we need a private ticket for marketing. 
I think when it comes to trac, a variant of Hanlon's razor applies:
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by
trac's insane maze of configuration.

("Trac: the issue tracking system with more configuration options than
features!")


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
Fedora Project Leader

[Chris Roberts]

I will look into this, not sure what changed as this is the first complaint in a long time
about the trac.

----- Original Message -----
From: Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
To: Fedora Marketing team <marketing(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
Sent: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:48:28 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: marketing tickets private?

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 02:22:23PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>  Um, seriously - no idea. They should be public. I don't think
> there's
>  many instances where we need a private ticket for marketing. 
I think when it comes to trac, a variant of Hanlon's razor applies:
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by
trac's insane maze of configuration.

("Trac: the issue tracking system with more configuration options than
features!")


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
Fedora Project Leader
-- 
marketing mailing list
marketing(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
List info or to change your subscription:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing

[Paul W. Frields]

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:19:08AM -0400, Chris Roberts wrote:
>  > ----- Original Message -----
>  > From: Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
>  > To: Fedora Marketing team <marketing(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
>  > Sent: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:48:28 -0400 (EDT)
>  > Subject: Re: marketing tickets private?
>  > 
>  > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 02:22:23PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>  > > Um, seriously - no idea. They should be public. I don't think there's
>  > > many instances where we need a private ticket for marketing.
>  > 
>  > I think when it comes to trac, a variant of Hanlon's razor applies:
>  > Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by
>  > trac's insane maze of configuration.
>  > 
>  > ("Trac: the issue tracking system with more configuration options than
>  > features!")
>  > 
>  
>  I will look into this, not sure what changed as this is the first
>  complaint in a long time about the trac. 
Try again now -- I believe I've fixed this.  (I just happened to run
across this email, and have the permissions to do so.)

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
    The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com