On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 05:06:32PM -0500, Mel Chua wrote:
I tried drafting out an ascii version of the workflow I saw being
tossed
around at FUDCon - thoughts? Is this accurate? Workable? It's pretty simple.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Insight#Content_workflow
(I'm not sure if I'm using the word "workflow" in the same way that FWN
uses it - if there's another word I should use instead, or some way this
diagram ought to be revised, please ping - or edit the wiki version. ;)
As a workflow it makes sense, in the answering if you are using the
correct term etc.
One thing that is missing is a box alongside "press" "web"
"fedora
planet" that is an in-flow for original content targeted for FI.
Might want to add that even if you don't intend original content for a
while?
To confirm you have the right idea, this is what a "normal" high-level
CMS workflow might look like:
+--------+
| Writer |------+
+--------+ |
| | Sent back for rewrite
| |
+--------+ |
| Editor |-----<NO>
+--------+
|
<YES>
|
+----------------------+ +-------------------------+
| Published or queued |-----<CANCEL>----| May cancel some content |
| by publishing editor | | as inappropriate or no |
+----------------------+ | longer relevant. |
+-------------------------+
- Karsten
--
name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Gardener
team: Red Hat Community Architecture
uri:
http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg: AD0E0C41