Hi,
Along with the Linux kernel, another interesting tidbit.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=x_server_contributors...
"There were eight major software vendors that turned up from our analysis and that included Apple, Debian, FreeBSD/NetBSD/OpenBSD, Gentoo, Mandriva, Novell, Red Hat, and Tungsten Graphics. The biggest software company contributing to the X server has been Red Hat"
"In third place for the number of commits is Adam Jackson, an employee of Red Hat. Adam has just been committing to X.Org since 2004 but he represents over 9% of the total workload. Adam Jackson is serving as the X.Org 7.4 release manager."
Rahul
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Rahul Sundaram sundaram@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi,
Along with the Linux kernel, another interesting tidbit.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=x_server_contributors...
Ah look the laypress is starting to pay attention. The level of contribution to upstream projects matters! Let's see if the take the next step and use their editorial soapboxes to start being critical of companies who aren't contributing back to the projects they depend on. A spotlight on companies who are benefiting from the work of open source projects but aren't support those very same projects would be a gloriously wonderful thing to see. I would almost call that the birth of a completely new type of laypress..a laypress dedicated to protecting the long term interests of the open ecosystem. That would be a laypress I could get behind.
Want to take any bets on which person in the press picks on this information as it relates to Shuttleworth's call on upstream project to sync release schedules to match Canonical's needs and does an unscientific inquiry as to exactly how much upstream involvement Canonical is actually providing to a number of important projects which Canonical relies on heavily. I think that would be a fascinating article to read.... it would even border on legitimate investigative journalism.
-jef
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org