[in the news] Fedora 14 vs. Ubuntu Maverick: Distinct Differences

[Kara Schiltz]

Datamation
11.2.10

Fedora 14 vs. Ubuntu Maverick: Distinct Differences
By Bruce Byfield

[[clip]

Both Fedora and Ubuntu continue to be centered on GNOME. At the same 
time, both offer alternative interfaces. But with Ubuntu's focus on 
improving usability in the GNOME interface and, in the next release, 
defaulting to its new GNOME-based Unity desktop, alternatives like the 
KDE-based Kubuntu or Xfce-based Xubuntu seem to be receiving less 
attention. Lesser-known graphical interfaces like LXDE and Sugar are 
available in Ubuntu, but receive little promotion 
http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/12068_3911026_2/Fedora-14-vs-Ubuntu-Maverick-Distinct-Differences.htm# 
in the release notes.

The same is true to an extent in Fedora. However, in the last few years, 
Fedora has been giving KDE and Xfce more attention, acknowledging them 
more strongly as alternatives. Fedora 14 continues this tradition by 
promoting the MeeGo mobile interface in its release notes.

Suggesting that Ubuntu neglects alternatives would be going too far. 
Still, it does seem accurate to say that the latest Ubuntu release 
focuses on its version of GNOME, and treats other desktops 
http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/12068_3911026_3/Fedora-14-vs-Ubuntu-Maverick-Distinct-Differences.htm# 
as secondary, particularly if they are not developed in a separate 
sub-project.

[clip]

By contrast, Fedora seems to retain more of the spirit of a traditional 
distribution, shipping a distribution that does not venture far 
technically from what upstream projects like GNOME offer. Nor does 
Fedora show many signs 
http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/12068_3911026_3/Fedora-14-vs-Ubuntu-Maverick-Distinct-Differences.htm# 
of preferring one interface over another, aside from the fact that it 
defaults to GNOME.

[clip]

The message in the release notes is that Fedora is for all sorts of 
users, whereas Ubuntu seems focused on as straightforward an experience 
for new users as possible. Nothing could more indicative of the 
differences in the two distro's current concerns.

Which of these two approaches to distribution-building is preferable 
remains a matter of choice. Ubuntu's popularity and the speed of its 
changes suggest that there is something to be said for its commercial, 
centralized approach. Yet, at the same time, Fedora's more generalist 
approach seems more tolerant of the differences in how users work.

In the end, neither Ubuntu 10.10 or Fedora 14 are major releases. 
However, if you look closely, you can see the seeds of differences that 
might grow larger over the next few years.

Full review:
http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/3911026/Fedora-14-vs-Ubunt...