Thank you for the very quick response I really do appreciate it. Is it
possible that you either add a note down the bottom to say that it is an
old article and it may not be relevant anymore or it is there for
historical reasons and it may not be relevant with current improvements.
Again thank you for your speed in reply and an interesting read with
very valid points. I look forward to reading more from you.
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 12:42 +0800, Ladislav Bodnar wrote:
On Friday 19 August 2005 12:31, you wrote:
> While I appreciate the complaints relating to RPM a lot of the points
> you point out are valid however. Relating to the upgrading I believe
> that major in-roads have been made in relation to Fedora.
That article was written over 3 years ago, so I don't think it is still
valid in this age of yum, apt-get, urpmi....
Thank you for your feedback :-)