I am a dentist. I have been a long time Linux (Fedora since RH 7 days) user at my home and always wish I could use Linux in the clinic. I find Linux to be incredibly stable, fast, reliable and secure.
At clinic, I am locked in to proprietary software simply because of lack of drivers for devices such as RVG (Kodak). Most representatives of the company I try to talk with in this regard are not even aware that there exists an operating system other than Windows. For them this is a one off and unreasonable demand to have drivers for Linux. (Perhaps they are right because not too many people ask for it. But that's a deadlock. People do not ask for it, because this option does not reach too many people.)
Lack of drivers is really a bottleneck in adopting a system the way I'd like it to be. I believe, OSS adoption is meaningful only if I adopt the Linux OS, too for all its benefits. For me, it's not just about running OSS workflow applications on Windows.
Any exchange of ideas on what to expect from OSS community in this regard, ways to awaken device manufacturers, any other technical hints as a way out are welcome.
Regards, Sonali.
Hi Sonali,
Nice that you mail back. :)
Lack of drivers is really a bottleneck in adopting a system the way I'd like it to be. I believe, OSS adoption is meaningful only if I adopt the Linux OS, too for all its benefits. For me, it's not just about running OSS workflow applications on Windows.
Someone pointed me to these links: "The Linux Driver Project is focused on creating and maintaining OpenSource Linux kernel drivers for all types of devices." http://www.linuxdriverproject.org/foswiki/bin/view and http://kerneldrivers.org/KernelDrivers.org
I think we can and should talk to them regarding this. Shouldn't we?
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:17:14PM +0530, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
Someone pointed me to these links: "The Linux Driver Project is focused on creating and maintaining OpenSource Linux kernel drivers for all types of devices." http://www.linuxdriverproject.org/foswiki/bin/view and http://kerneldrivers.org/KernelDrivers.org
I'm sure there are many groups like this and hence we see Linux running on so many notebooks for example, with wide variety of hardware.
But the OSS community is driven by the quantum of need. Unfortunately there are too few medical professionals that are interested in using Linux and who also need to interface their devices. Most are content using whatever piece of software the manufacturer provides to them.
Secondly, as one of the above sites says, the developers' community needs specifications for the hardware. They may manage to reverse engineer it occasionally, but who will do that for specific devices used in medicine?
I just have questions like these... Not sure whether there will ever be practicable answers to them...
Sonali.
medical-sig@lists.fedorahosted.org