================================================
#fedora-blocker-review: f20beta-blocker-review-2
================================================
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-02/f20beta-b…
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-02/f20beta-b…
Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-02/f20beta-b…
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (tflink, 16:00:25)
* Introduction (tflink, 16:04:09)
* Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and freeze
exception bugs. (tflink, 16:04:14)
* We'll be following the process outlined at: (tflink, 16:04:19)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(tflink, 16:04:19)
* The bugs up for review today are available at: (tflink, 16:04:29)
* LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (tflink,
16:04:29)
* The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (tflink,
16:04:35)
* Up for review today, we have: (tflink, 16:05:06)
* 9 Proposed Blockers (tflink, 16:05:34)
* 7 Accepted Blockers (tflink, 16:05:34)
* 1 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:05:34)
* 4 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:05:35)
* (1009809) KeyError: 'name' (tflink, 16:06:44)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009809 (tflink,
16:06:44)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ON_QA (tflink, 16:06:44)
* AGREED: 1009809 - This still needs testing to see if at least 1 of
nfs/nfsiso works - will revisit once that testing has been done
(tflink, 16:10:10)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012504 (tflink,
16:10:16)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 16:10:16)
* AGREED: 1012504 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta
release criterion for btrfs custom partitions: "When using the
custom partitioning flow, the installer must be able to ... Create
mount points backed by ext4 partitions, LVM volumes or btrfs volumes
..." (tflink, 16:17:54)
* (1010495) Apple Mac EFI: you have not created a bootloader stage1
target device (tflink, 16:18:07)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010495 (tflink,
16:18:10)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST (tflink, 16:18:13)
* AGREED: 1010495 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta
release criterion for EFI system partitions on apple hardware:
"Cleanly install to a disk with a valid ms-dos or gpt disk label and
partition table which contains existing data and sufficient
unpartitioned space for a Fedora installation" (tflink, 16:25:03)
* (1013800) devicetree.py:1293:handleVgLvs:DeviceTreeError: failed to
look up thin pool (tflink, 16:25:15)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013800 (tflink,
16:25:18)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:25:21)
* AGREED: 1013800 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta
release criterion for LVM thinp: "When using the guided partitioning
flow, the installer must be able to ... Complete an installation
using any combination of disk configuration options it allows the
user to select" (tflink, 16:28:14)
* (1013586) SizeNotPositiveError: spec= param must be >=0 (tflink,
16:28:39)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013586 (tflink,
16:28:39)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:28:39)
* AGREED: 1013586 - We need more information and testing to figure out
how common this failure mode is. will re-visit once more testing has
been done. (tflink, 16:35:03)
* (1012646) anaconda creates grub.cfg lacking an initrd entry, kernel
panics on reboot (tflink, 16:35:42)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012646 (tflink,
16:35:45)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 16:35:47)
* AGREED: 1012646 - RejectedBlocker - This is a problem but the actual
bug is in grubby, not anaconda and in this case, anaconda is
behaving as expected (tflink, 16:40:26)
* (1013087) selection of rescue kernel causes kernel panic, due to lack
of initramfs (tflink, 16:40:43)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013087 (tflink,
16:40:46)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:40:48)
* AGREED: 1013087 - RejectedBlocker - While unfortunate, this does not
violate any F20 beta release criteria and thus is rejected as a
release blocking issue for f20 beta (tflink, 16:53:10)
* (1013767) rootfs on thinp not found, startup failure (tflink,
16:53:35)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013767 (tflink,
16:53:35)
* Proposed Blocker, dracut, NEW (tflink, 16:53:35)
* AGREED: 1013767 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha
release criterion for LVM thinp autopart installs: "A system
installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in
screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a
user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility."
(tflink, 17:06:49)
* (864198) grubby fatal error updating grub.cfg when /boot is btrfs
(tflink, 17:06:59)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864198 (tflink,
17:07:02)
* Proposed Blocker, grubby, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:07:05)
* AGREED: 864198 - RejectedBlocker - This does not clearly violate any
F20 beta criteria and is a corner case. Therefore, it does not
qualify as a release blocking bug for f20 beta. (tflink, 17:39:25)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980221 (adamw,
17:41:14)
* (1007590) Black screen after F20 graphical install on PPC64 (tflink,
17:44:05)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007590 (tflink,
17:44:08)
* Proposed Freeze Exceptions, glibc, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:44:10)
* AGREED: 1007590 - AcceptedFreezeException - This is a showstopper
for PPC64 and while not PA, a tested fix would be considered past
freeze. (tflink, 17:47:29)
* (1000891) DVD is oversized (larger than 4.7 GB) (tflink, 17:53:34)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000891 (tflink,
17:53:34)
* Accepted Blocker, distribution, NEW (tflink, 17:53:35)
* ACTION: jreznik to start investigating ways to trim down the dvd
size or find someone to do it (tflink, 17:59:38)
* DVD still oversize, needs discussion/changes to get it back under
4.7 GB (tflink, 18:00:04)
* Open Floor (tflink, 18:04:01)
* next blocker review meeting will be 2013-10-09 @ 16:00 UTC (tflink,
18:06:00)
Meeting ended at 18:07:58 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* jreznik to start investigating ways to trim down the dvd size or find
someone to do it
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* jreznik
* jreznik to start investigating ways to trim down the dvd size or
find someone to do it
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* tflink (240)
* cmurf (181)
* adamw (179)
* Viking-Ice (110)
* kparal (56)
* roshi (37)
* dan408 (37)
* zodbot (11)
* jreznik (10)
* handsome_pirate (9)
* mkrizek (1)
* pwhalen (1)
* pschindl (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
As always, minutes and IRC transcript available on the wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130930
Next meeting is scheduled for 2013-08-12 at 1500 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
If you have topics you think we should bring up at the meeting, please
add them to the Wiki page at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130107 . Thanks!
TOPIC: Previous meeting follow-up
=======================================================================
* "tflink to talk to releng about where to file bugs in the
cloud .ks and whether it needs to be packaged in the distro"
- not done yet, tflink forgot. Re-actioned for next week
* "adamw to get F20 common bugs page up and populated" - this
was done[1], adam asked for people to add any more
appropriate issues
* "adamw to send the update criteria to 'production'" - this
was done[2]
* "adamw to check if any further criteria changes are needed to
beta/final for arm/cloud" - adam had taken a quick look, but
thought more in-depth assessment was needed
TOPIC: Fedora 20 Beta pre-TC1 planning
=======================================================================
* TC1 scheduled for the following day, 2013-10-01
* No-one was aware of any major problems which might affect TC
schedule
* Live compose was failing due to a depcheck error, but releng
already aware
TOPIC: Open floor
=======================================================================
* tflink noted that there has been talk of having a short
schedule for F21
* spstarr pointed out that KDE may be gaining official Wayland
compatibility at that time, which would be a major change
* We agreed to relay our concerns regarding keeping any changes
in a short-cycle release small and manageable to FESCo at
their next meeting
Action items
=======================================================================
* tflink or someone competent to talk to releng about where to
file bugs in the cloud .ks and whether it needs to be
packaged in the distro
* adamw to talk to anaconda devs and get a build done for beta
tc1 with live keyboard bug fixed
* spstarr to work on iSCSI install testing
* adamw to look into nightly fail
1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs
2. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-September/118060.html
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin DOT net
http://www.happyassassin.net