meetingminutes January 2014

meetingminutes@lists.fedoraproject.org

20 participants
54 discussions

EMEA ambassadors meeting minutes 2013-01-08
by Jiri Eischmann 08 Jan '14

08 Jan '14

Hi, we had another regional meeting. 15 ambassadors attended and the meeting lasted 1 hour and 30 minutes. If you'd like to know more, read the minutes: Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-08/emea_ambassadors… Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-08/emea_ambassadors… Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-08/emea_ambassadors… The next meeting will be on January 22nd. Meet you in two weeks! Jiri

1 0

Fedora Latam Ambassadors Meeting log / Registrs de la reunion de embajadores de Fedora Latam 2014-01-08
by alejandro perez 08 Jan '14

08 Jan '14

Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-08/fedora_latam_amb… Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-08/fedora_latam_amb… Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-08/fedora_latam_amb…

1 0

Fedora ARM Status Meeting Minutes 2014-01-08
by Paul Whalen 08 Jan '14

08 Jan '14

Thanks to those that were able to join us for the status meeting today, for those unable the minutes are posted below: Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-01-08/fedora-meeting… Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-01-08/fedora-meeting… Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-01-08/fedora-meeting… ============================================ #fedora-meeting-1: Fedora ARM status meeting ============================================ Meeting started by pwhalen at 21:01:22 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-01-08/fedora-meeting… . Meeting summary --------------- * 1a) Aarch64 - Status Update (pwhalen, 21:03:00) * koji builds are running now- pbrobinson driving builds (bconoboy, 21:04:37) * Numerous bugs being worked through- mariadb is pressing (bconoboy, 21:07:04) * More builders being added this month (bconoboy, 21:08:54) * 2a) F21 - Hardware Support Goals (pwhalen, 21:13:27) * 3.13 kernel feature set is similar to 3.12, no new hardware specifically tested yet (bconoboy, 21:20:38) * Note to BBB users: 3.12 kernel will make BBB video work on F20 release (bconoboy, 21:21:07) * 3.12.7 will be the one to go with (pbrobinson, 21:21:32) * 2b) F21 - Installation Images (pwhalen, 21:27:34) * LINK: Hans' proposed kernel patch plan needs attention https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kernel/2013-December/004752.html (bconoboy, 21:32:48) * 4) Open Floor (pwhalen, 21:35:47) * LINK: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/qa-devel/2014-January/000599.html (handsome_pirate, 21:36:30) Meeting ended at 21:49:57 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * pbrobinson (69) * bconoboy (50) * dgilmore (38) * hrw (29) * handsome_pirate (22) * pwhalen (21) * jwb (13) * masta (12) * zodbot (12) * ctyler (4) * jcapik (3) * ahs3 (2) * dmarlin (1) * agreene (1) * msalter (0) * jdisnard (0) * jonmasters (0) * ddd (0)

1 0

FAmNA Meeting (04 Jun 2013)
by inode0 07 Jan '14

07 Jan '14

====================== #fedora-meeting: famna ====================== Meeting started by inode0 at 02:02:24 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-08/famna.2014-01-08… . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (inode0, 02:02:46) * Announcements (inode0, 02:06:12) * Agenda (inode0, 02:13:39) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/famna/report/9 (inode0, 02:13:46) * AGREED: Initial funding for TXLF 2014 as described in ticket 69 approved. (inode0, 02:28:16) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TXLF_2014 (inode0, 02:28:58) * AGREED: Get a new set of vertical banners for events. (inode0, 02:34:01) * Open Floor (inode0, 02:42:28) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/famnarequests/ (inode0, 02:51:46) Meeting ended at 02:52:08 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * inode0 (71) * award3535 (30) * dan408_ (25) * kk4ewt (23) * handsome1pirate (23) * suehle (14) * ParadoxGuitarist (12) * zodbot (8) * rbergeron (7) John

1 1

Re: [Ambassadors] REMINDER French Fedora Meeting Today #fedora-meeting-1
by Emmanuel Seyman 07 Jan '14

07 Jan '14

* Reminder [07/01/2014 08:30] : > > Ce mail est un rappel pour la réunion de la communauté francophone, qui aura > lieu ce mardi ( 7 janvier) à 21h00 heure de Paris sur IRC (freenode) > #fedora-meeting-1 . Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-01-07/fedora-meeting… or http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-01-07/fedora-meeting… Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-01-07/fedora-meeting…

1 0

Server WG Meeting Minutes (2014-01-07)
by Stephen Gallagher 07 Jan '14

07 Jan '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 =================================================================== #fedora-meeting-1: Server Working Group Weekly Meeting (2014-01-07) =================================================================== Meeting started by sgallagh at 16:01:05 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-01-07/fedora-meeting… . Meeting summary - --------------- * roll call (sgallagh, 16:01:18) * Server Role Requirements (sgallagh, 16:05:38) * LINK: https://www.piratepad.ca/p/serverwg-roles-proposal (mizmo, 16:10:13) * LINK: https://pad.riseup.net/p/serverwg-roles-proposal (davidstrauss, 16:10:47) Meeting ended at 17:37:40 UTC. Action Items - ------------ Action Items, by person - ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) - --------------------------- * sgallagh (146) * simo (91) * mizmo (66) * mitr (55) * rdoty (34) * davidstrauss (27) * nirik (26) * zodbot (9) * adamw (5) * tuanta (5) * jwb (4) * Evolution (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLMO9sACgkQeiVVYja6o6MfSwCfdfthKvaVcQ/IzsOt+oUdJnL/ upwAnRm6QQFZFBeipEGIgfgYErD4GdDG =Lz4r -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: Agenda for today's Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2013-12-17)
by Marcela Mašláňová 07 Jan '14

07 Jan '14

============================================ #fedora-meeting: env and stacks (2014-01-07) ============================================ Meeting started by mmaslano at 13:00:41 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-07/env_and_stacks.2… . Meeting summary --------------- * init process (mmaslano, 13:01:15) * PRD (mmaslano, 13:04:16) * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mmaslano/Draft:Env_and_Stack_PRD (mmaslano, 13:04:20) * ACTION: tomorrow will be finished first draft (mmaslano, 14:17:39) Meeting ended at 14:17:43 UTC. Action Items ------------ * tomorrow will be finished first draft Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * tomorrow will be finished first draft People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * tjanez (42) * juhp_ (37) * mmaslano (28) * samkottler (14) * hhorak (10) * bkabrda (6) * pkovar (5) * pingou (4) * zodbot (4) * pkovar1 (2) * sochotni (2) * hhorak1 (1) * abadger1999 (0) * juhp (0) * handsome_pirate (0) 13:00:41 <mmaslano> #startmeeting env and stacks (2014-01-07) 13:00:41 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue Jan 7 13:00:41 2014 UTC. The chair is mmaslano. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:41 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 13:00:51 <mmaslano> #meetingname env and stacks 13:00:51 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'env_and_stacks' 13:01:07 <mmaslano> #chair abadger1999 pkovar tjanez samkottler bkabrda handsome_pirate hhorak juhp 13:01:07 <zodbot> Current chairs: abadger1999 bkabrda handsome_pirate hhorak juhp mmaslano pkovar samkottler tjanez 13:01:15 <mmaslano> #topic init process 13:01:18 * samkottler is here 13:01:28 <juhp_> hi 13:01:31 <tjanez> Hi 13:02:19 <bkabrda> hi 13:02:22 <pkovar> hi there 13:02:53 <mmaslano> hi guys 13:02:57 <hhorak1> Hi 13:04:16 <mmaslano> #topic PRD 13:04:20 <mmaslano> #info https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mmaslano/Draft:Env_and_Stack_PRD 13:06:05 <mmaslano> did you have time to read it? 13:06:30 <samkottler> I've gone through it a bit, I think one big gap is that we don't have user stories 13:06:44 <mmaslano> feel free to define them 13:07:40 <tjanez> samkottler: I was thinking about it since I had a homework last to time to summarize the Big Data SIG use case 13:08:42 <tjanez> Should we have an additional section in the PRD for Use cases? 13:08:52 <tjanez> Or should we emulate Personas? 13:09:58 <juhp_> probably use cases would be ok? 13:11:31 <hhorak> I guess use cases could be part of the particular taks' definition, I don't think we have some general group use cases, do we? 13:12:06 <pkovar> hhorak, +1 13:13:49 <tjanez> hhorak, your proposal is probably ok for simpler use cases, but a more complex description of, for example, what the Big Data SIG wishes from our WG should be described separately 13:15:04 <bkabrda> tjanez: but if the Big Data SIG wants that, they should provide use cases and we should think about how we solve them, right? 13:16:11 <mmaslano> tjanez: if I remember correctly, they wanted scl 13:16:21 <tjanez> bkabrda, agreed. That's why I was in favor of having a separate section in the PRD. 13:17:30 <tjanez> mmaslano, they want a way to provide language ecosystems in fedora that aligns w/ how the language itself is used 13:17:37 <juhp_> I think the PRD tasks list looks pretty good - though maybe a bit ambitious of one year :) 13:17:47 <juhp_> of = for 13:18:11 <tjanez> SCLs are a part of the solution 13:18:11 <hhorak> tjanez: if these use cases are covered by more tasks, then yes. But I don't think we have such general use cases right now. 13:18:26 <mmaslano> tjanez: I'm not against their usecase, but I guess we don't have time to create so many Personnas as Server did 13:18:48 <tjanez> Ok, I agree it would look a bit odd to only have one use case 13:19:12 <mmaslano> tjanez: feel free to add it. I don't think we have people for doing more 13:19:13 <tjanez> in that case it would be better to put it as an example under one task 13:20:11 <mmaslano> samkottler: do you have more usecases on your mind? 13:20:24 <mmaslano> samkottler: um user stories? 13:20:28 <samkottler> I think the main ones from my perspective are: 13:20:37 <samkottler> 1) the big data stuff they've asked for 13:20:50 <samkottler> 2) the 'developer who deploys code' use case 13:21:12 <samkottler> 3) people who want to redistribute applications using SCL 13:21:32 <samkottler> there are a lot more, but those are the main overview ones 13:24:05 <mmaslano> samkottler: can you add it there? 13:24:20 <tjanez> I agree that the PRD task lisk is pretty big. Do we want to eliminate the tasks that we deem not to important / out-of-scope or do we want to put "everything we came up with" in the PRD? 13:24:21 <samkottler> mmaslano: yeah, I'll write up my thoughts on it after the meeting 13:24:43 <samkottler> tjanez: I think we can remove very specific stuff and just make it high level 13:25:16 <tjanez> samkottler, I have something for the big data stuff user story in mind. Want me to take it? 13:25:28 <samkottler> tjanez: sounds good 13:25:37 <samkottler> or we can talk after and figure out where things overlap and go from there 13:25:38 <juhp_> samkottler, I agree good to have user stories to motivate the task list 13:26:25 <tjanez> samkottler, ok 13:26:41 <hhorak> tjanez: Some kind of highlighting was also on my mind -- at least labeling some tasks as important and consider the rest as nice to have 13:26:49 <juhp_> there might be some user stories in the Workstation PRD too - eg developers wanting latest stacks etc 13:27:02 <samkottler> well the PRD shouldn't really be a task list, it should be a document showing our purpose 13:27:10 <samkottler> tasks can be defined completely outside of that 13:27:15 <juhp_> true 13:27:52 <tjanez> hhorak, yes that would be good. We don't want to promise too much and then underdeliver 13:28:54 <hhorak> samkottler: I agree, but what we have that is actually what I'd expect, just call it differently than "tasks", maybe "goals"? 13:29:09 <samkottler> hhorak: +1 to goals 13:29:15 <juhp_> I will probably re-read the draft Workstation PRD and can try to pick out any potential user stories for this WG at the same time 13:29:16 <tjanez> samkottler, I agree with you that our PRD should also include a paragraph about the general purpose of our WG 13:30:06 <juhp_> yeah Goals sounds better probably 13:30:19 <tjanez> +1 for goals 13:30:51 <juhp_> we can break out more detail tasks etc latter based on the Goals list :) 13:32:23 <tjanez> Regarding the purpose/aim of our WG, I have two proposals: 13:32:29 <tjanez> Our WG incubates ideas, some will be later abandoned, some will be re-iterated and formalized and then put into Fedora *proper* (we also need to define Fedora *proper*) 13:32:35 <tjanez> 2) We are working on enabling new things (including new ways to get Fedora, new things that are Fedora) 13:32:45 <tjanez> Both are from our previous IRC meetings 13:36:36 <juhp_> I missed the last meetings last month so may be missing some context, but personally I feel more excited and motivated by (2) 13:37:45 <hhorak> tjanez: I understand "proper" as "stable" 13:39:37 <juhp_> do we have a deadline for the current scoping/planning phase or for the "PRD" at least? 13:40:02 <hhorak> juhp_ I guess the deadline is on Monday 13:40:20 <juhp_> ok right 13:40:28 <tjanez> hhorak, "stable" is probably also too vague. I was thinking more in terms of "Officially released and endorsed (supported?) by the Fedora Project." 13:40:32 <pkovar> yep, it should be jan 13 13:41:20 <juhp_> official Fedora 13:42:10 <hhorak> tjanez: juhp_: that seems fine to me 13:42:31 <juhp_> so we probably need a draft ready within the next couple of days for final review? 13:43:06 <mmaslano> yes 13:44:23 <tjanez> Should we leave the task list as it is and work on polishing the PRD or do we want to shorten it, pick focus? 13:45:56 <mmaslano> tjanez: mostly there are listed tasks, which have dedicated developer 13:45:57 <bkabrda> tjanez: I'm for shortening. let's leave out the things that are marked as "out of scope" (CI, scl-utils v2) 13:47:48 <hhorak> bkabrda: I'd rather leave it there, maybe move it to special category "out of scope", since otherwise somebody can come up with the same topic in a year again and again, while not knowing that it is out of scope.. 13:48:22 <pkovar> yes, that makes sense 13:48:44 <bkabrda> hhorak: sounds good 13:48:51 <pkovar> i think a special section at the bottom can't hurt 13:49:42 <juhp_> so should we add a Goals section? 13:50:18 <tjanez> juhp_, I though we want to rename the Tasks section to Goals 13:51:50 <juhp_> yes 13:51:57 <juhp_> just checking :) 13:52:36 <tjanez> ok :) 13:52:57 <mmaslano> so, when do you plan to finish it? 13:53:12 <mmaslano> because we should approve it before saying it's okay 13:53:19 <juhp_> right 13:54:04 <juhp_> we might need a couple of rounds of drafts - time is certainly short 13:55:14 <hhorak> If we want to label some tasks/goals as our priority, I'd propose those that have some requirement already: taskotron, scls, copr, documentation for scl 13:55:38 <juhp_> +1 13:56:10 <mmaslano> +1 13:56:14 <tjanez> hhorak, +1 13:56:48 <juhp_> I like some of the Automation stuff too 13:57:49 <juhp_> but I agree focusing is good 13:58:06 <tjanez> If pingou plans on working on "Automated package review tools", we could also mark that as a pripority 13:58:18 <juhp_> ah yeah 14:00:35 <tjanez> Some parts of the Tasks/Goals list seem to terse to me (e.g. Build systems, SCL). Does anyone share that opinion? 14:01:20 <juhp_> so can we have a final draft ready by Thursday so we can all vote/approve it by Friday hopefully? 14:01:26 <juhp_> tjanez, I tend to agree 14:02:00 <juhp_> probably good to reword some of it after changing Tasks to Goals 14:02:15 <tjanez> juhp_, +1 for Thursday 14:03:22 <juhp_> or is Thu too late? well maybe we need a initial draft for review tomorrow? 14:03:58 <tjanez> juhp_, yes, we need to polish the wording and make it understandable for someone not coming from our WG (Fedora even). 14:03:58 <mmaslano> I'm fine with Thursday, but I already wrote what I want 14:04:44 <juhp_> mmaslano, okay :) 14:06:03 <juhp_> mmaslano, it is ok for us to edit that page right? :) 14:06:36 <mmaslano> right 14:06:47 <tjanez> I don't know enough about the details of the Build systems, SCLs and CI, but I would ask someone knowledgeable to expand and clarify those parts 14:07:20 <juhp_> probably good if people can post to the mailing list after making larger changes to it anyway - I will try to keep an eye on the page and also help with editing 14:07:38 <juhp_> tjanez, +1 14:07:53 <tjanez> CI is probably not critical, since it will be put in the Out-of-scope section, right 14:08:03 <pkovar1> (i can also help with editing) 14:08:04 <pingou> tjanez: my idea was about moving the packge review off bugzilla and integrate it with fedora-review, so "tools" might be a little excessive :) 14:08:43 <tjanez> pingou, thanks for dropping in :) 14:08:47 <pingou> sure thing 14:08:55 <mmaslano> pingou: sounds lovely 14:09:18 <pingou> mmaslano: gotta say, I've had the idea for a little while :] 14:09:19 <tjanez> well, feel free to edit that part of the PRD. I wrote it based on the email by sochotni 14:10:14 <tjanez> I put a general term "Automated package review tools" in the PRD, since PRDs are suppose to be general 14:10:35 <juhp_> and for things we think should be changed/updated/expanded maybe good to post specific suggestions/question to the ml to get attention 14:10:47 <pingou> tjanez: well that part seems like a nice TODO list for the tool :D 14:11:22 <tjanez> pingou: yes, I agree :) 14:12:23 <tjanez> juhp_: yes, it's probably best to highlight the "controversial" parts and discuss them on the ML 14:13:03 <mmaslano> could someone finish meeting instead of me? I have to go to another meeting 14:13:49 <tjanez> mmaslano, I can finish it, just tell me where to find a cheat-sheet for the commands 14:13:50 <juhp_> tjanez, right or like you said things one is unsure about 14:14:25 * bkabrda needs to go, too 14:14:51 <sochotni> tjanez: https://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot 14:15:13 <sochotni> at least I think so :-0 14:15:25 <tjanez> sochotni, thanks 14:16:11 <tjanez> Well, do we agree that the first draft should be ready tomorrow? 14:16:16 <mmaslano> +1 14:16:20 <tjanez> And the final draft on Thursday 14:16:25 <juhp_> +1 14:16:31 <hhorak> +1 14:16:32 <juhp_> sounds good to me 14:16:35 <bkabrda> +1 14:16:47 <mmaslano> or do you want to close meeting right now? 14:16:55 <tjanez> +1 14:17:00 <tjanez> mmaslano, you can close 14:17:04 <juhp_> +1 14:17:13 <pkovar1> +1 14:17:39 <mmaslano> #action tomorrow will be finished first draft 14:17:43 <mmaslano> #endmeeting

1 0

Fedora Marketing Meeting 6/1/13 Minutes
by Zacharias Mitzelos 06 Jan '14

06 Jan '14

Hey all, We had another Marketing meeting today, you can read the meeting minutes below: Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-meeting.2… Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-meeting.2… Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-meeting.2… Warm Regards, Zacharias (mitzie)

1 0

FAmSCo meeting minutes 2013-01-06
by Jiri Eischmann 06 Jan '14

06 Jan '14

Hi, we had another FAmSCo meeting today. 5 out of 7 members attended. Main points from the meeting: * Christop Wickert will be the wrangler for FAmSCo elections. The nomination phase will be from Jan 8th to 13th. * Deadline for final versions of regional budgets for fiscal year 2015 is January 31st. * The only bid for FUDCon LATAM 2014 is Managua, Nicaragua. Flock 2014 will be in Prague. You find more in the minutes: Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2014-01-06/famsco.2014-01… Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2014-01-06/famsco.2014-01… Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2014-01-06/famsco.2014-01… The next meeting will be on January 13th. Meet you next week! Jiri

1 0

2014-01-06 - Fedora QA Meeting - minutes
by Adam Williamson 06 Jan '14

06 Jan '14

>From this week onwards, we have agreed to abandon the laboriously hand-edited minutes and per-meeting Wiki pages. From now on, we will simply send out the MeetBot-generated meeting minutes, and link to those from the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings . Future minutes emails will contain the bare text format minutes generated by Meetbot, as seen below. I'd actually quite like to use the HTML format minutes - http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-qa.2014-0… - as they're much easier to read, but anti-HTML-email sentiment is so embedded by now that this is likely impractical. ================================== #fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting ================================== Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:04 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-06/fedora-qa.2014-0… . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll call (adamw, 16:00:11) * Previous meeting follow-up (adamw, 16:11:20) * "adamw to send fedup/thinp post-mortem email" - I sent one - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-December/119820.html - but didn't cover the thinp bug, whoops (adamw, 16:13:20) * QA/Join page revision (adamw, 16:20:12) * LINK: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2014-January/119890.html (adamw, 16:20:41) * roshi and danofsatx came up with a proposal for a revised QA/Join page (adamw, 16:20:54) * roshi will send out a new draft based on list feedback (adamw, 16:21:18) * general agreement to try and avoid mentioning 'bugzappers' and 'proven testers' directly to avoid confusion (adamw, 16:22:56) * seems like everyone's happy with the current approach to the rewrite, thanks for the work roshi and danofsatx (adamw, 16:24:50) * Meeting minutes (adamw, 16:27:14) * currently we keep meeting minutes in a hand-written format at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings (adamw, 16:30:39) * the wiki meeting pages are usually created before the meeting and in theory can be edited to add something to the agenda (adamw, 16:34:03) * AGREED: from 2014 on, we'll drop the manual handling of meeting minutes and do it all via meetbot (adamw, 16:35:41) * side note: kparal has added the meeting schedule to fedocal for 2014 (adamw, 16:36:41) * fedocal link for QA: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/QA/ (adamw, 16:38:08) * open floor (adamw, 16:40:07) * LINK: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2445 (cmurf, 16:40:13) * LINK: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6868 (cmurf, 16:41:15) * Viking-Ice points out Matthew Miller's mail about plans for 2014, https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-January/193401.html (adamw, 16:43:58) * ACTION: adamw to send a mail to test@ about the ten year t-shirt thing (adamw, 17:00:13) * once again, we all registered concern at the direction of the Fedora.next project and its implications for testing given the apparent broadening of the scope of deliverables without a plan in place for testing (adamw, 17:04:30) Meeting ended at 17:05:52 UTC. Action Items ------------ * adamw to send a mail to test@ about the ten year t-shirt thing Action Items, by person ----------------------- * adamw * adamw to send a mail to test@ about the ten year t-shirt thing * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * adamw (123) * handsome_pirate (70) * cmurf (63) * Viking-Ice (55) * roshi (50) * tflink (40) * jokerdino (23) * kparal (22) * danofsatx (20) * brunowolff (17) * nirik (14) * zodbot (8) * pingou (4) * satellit (4) * jreznik (4) * nb (2) * mkrizek (1) * pwhalen (1) * satellit_e (1) * pschindl (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

meetingminutes January 2014