Notification time stamped 2023-09-04 17:52:58 UTC
==========================================
#fedora-blocker-review: F39-blocker-review
==========================================
Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:40 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2023-09-04/f39-bloc…
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (adamw, 16:00:46)
* Introduction (adamw, 16:06:10)
* Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
bugs. (adamw, 16:06:10)
* We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 16:06:10)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(adamw, 16:06:10)
* The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 16:06:12)
* LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw,
16:06:14)
* The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw,
16:06:16)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria
(adamw, 16:06:18)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Beta_Release_Criteria
(adamw, 16:06:20)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Final_Release_Criteria
(adamw, 16:06:24)
* for Beta, we have: (adamw, 16:06:26)
* 3 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 16:06:28)
* 7 Accepted Blockers (adamw, 16:06:30)
* 2 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (adamw, 16:06:32)
* 31 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (adamw, 16:06:34)
* for Final, we have: (adamw, 16:06:36)
* 4 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 16:06:42)
* 2 Accepted Blockers (adamw, 16:06:42)
* frantisekz will secretarialize (adamw, 16:08:03)
* Proposed Beta blockers (adamw, 16:08:15)
* (2234518) webUI: allows you to enter an encryption passphrase in
non-ASCII characters with no warning (adamw, 16:08:30)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234518 (adamw,
16:08:30)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1193
(adamw, 16:08:30)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST (adamw, 16:08:31)
* Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+3,0,-4) (+tflink, +nielsenb, +lruzicka,
-geraldosimiao, -imsedgar, -kparal, -bcotton) (adamw, 16:08:31)
* Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+1,0,-0) (+adamwill) (adamw,
16:08:33)
* AGREED: 2234518 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedFreezeException
(Beta) - we agreed that anaconda not displaying a warning here is
not in itself serious enough to be a blocker bug, but fixing it
would be useful. The libblockdev crash and gnome-initial-setup
keyboard layout selection issues are being addressed separately
(adamw, 16:18:29)
* (2234640) Installer webUI doesn't allow to install system without
separate boot partition (adamw, 16:18:42)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234640 (adamw,
16:18:42)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1249
(adamw, 16:18:42)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw, 16:18:42)
* Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+2,0,-2) (+geraldosimiao, +bcotton,
-kparal, -lruzicka) (adamw, 16:18:42)
* Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+2,0,-0) (+kparal, +lruzicka)
(adamw, 16:18:44)
* AGREED: 2234640 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedFreezeException
(Beta) - this does not really violate any Beta criteria, though we
see significant concerns with whether it's appropriate for anaconda
to suddenly start enforcing a requirement for a separate /boot when
it did not previously. Accepted as an FE - if we do change this, it
makes sense to do so for Beta, not change it between Beta and Final.
(adamw, 16:32:32)
* (2235236) CVE-2023-30079 libeconf: Stack overflow in function
read_file at atlibeconf/lib/getfilecontents.c [fedora-all] (adamw,
16:32:50)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235236 (adamw,
16:32:50)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1253
(adamw, 16:32:50)
* Proposed Blocker, libeconf, MODIFIED (adamw, 16:32:50)
* Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+2,0,-1) (+geraldosimiao, +lruzicka,
-adamwill) (adamw, 16:32:50)
* Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+2,0,-0) (+bcotton, +adamwill) (adamw,
16:32:54)
* Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+3,0,-0) (+bcotton, +kparal,
+adamwill) (adamw, 16:32:56)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Final_Release_Criteria#Final_Block…
(geraldosimiao, 16:39:15)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Final_Release_Criteria#Final_Block…
(geraldosimiao, 16:40:08)
* AGREED: 2235236 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedBlocker (Final)
AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this is rejected as a Beta blocker
as it doesn't violate any Beta criterion. It does violate the
security criterion for Final so it's accepted as a Final blocker,
and a Beta FE as it would be good to fix it for Beta too (adamw,
16:45:55)
* that's all the Beta blocker proposals, moving on to: (adamw,
16:46:28)
* proposed Beta freeze exceptions (adamw, 16:46:33)
* (2236321) coreutils-9.4 reverts an undesirable change to the -v option
that landed in coreutils-9.3 (adamw, 16:46:44)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236321 (adamw,
16:46:44)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1239
(adamw, 16:46:44)
* Proposed Freeze Exceptions, coreutils, ON_QA (adamw, 16:46:44)
* AGREED: 2236321 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - the benefit here
isn't huge (getting the new/old behaviour during live sessions and
at first boot, not just on first update) but the risk is also small
and we're feeling generous, so...fine (adamw, 16:55:12)
* (2237039) NeoChat cannot verify its sessions with other Matrix clients
(adamw, 16:55:21)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237039 (adamw,
16:55:21)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1254
(adamw, 16:55:22)
* Proposed Freeze Exceptions, neochat, ON_QA (adamw, 16:55:22)
* Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+2,0,-2) (+nixuser, +lruzicka,
-kparal, -adamwill) (adamw, 16:55:22)
* AGREED: 2237039 - RejectedFreezeException (Beta) - as neochat is not
preinstalled in any image we know of, there doesn't seem to be any
reason to give this an FE, it is fine being a regular update
(adamw, 17:00:47)
* that's all the proposed Beta FEs, let's move onto: (adamw,
17:01:24)
* Proposed Final blockers (adamw, 17:01:28)
* two can be decided with ticket votes, so we only have two to handle
(adamw, 17:01:39)
* (2236438) Anaconda is very slow to show a window after clicking
install in gnome-initial-setup (adamw, 17:02:08)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236438 (adamw,
17:02:08)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1242
(adamw, 17:02:08)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (adamw, 17:02:08)
* Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+3,0,-0) (+kparal, +lruzicka,
+adamwill) (adamw, 17:02:08)
* AGREED: 2236438 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - we agree that ideally
anaconda should start faster and/or the user should get some
feedback indicating it's loading, but this really doesn't take long
enough to plausibly constitute a release blocker. note it's already
accepted as Beta FE (adamw, 17:21:19)
* (2189899) Blivet-GUI: A btrfs partition can't be reformatted (adamw,
17:21:39)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189899 (adamw,
17:21:39)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1157
(adamw, 17:21:39)
* Proposed Blocker, blivet-gui, NEW (adamw, 17:21:39)
* Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+1,0,-0) (+nielsenb) (adamw, 17:21:39)
* AGREED: 2189899 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - based on feedback from
vtrefny via kparal at
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1157#comment-872594
, we agree it doesn't make sense to take too strict of an
interpretation and make this a blocker. we will document how to
handle it as a common bug (adamw, 17:30:54)
* (2187858) sddm-wayland-plasma does not respect keyboard layout variant
(adamw, 17:31:09)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187858 (adamw,
17:31:09)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1158
(adamw, 17:31:09)
* Proposed Blocker, sddm, NEW (adamw, 17:31:09)
* Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+1,0,-1) (+geraldosimiao, -catanzaro)
(adamw, 17:31:09)
* Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+3,0,-0) (+geraldosimiao, +nielsenb,
+catanzaro) (adamw, 17:31:11)
* AGREED: 2187858 - punt (delay decision) - we did not yet get around
to the re-testing that we agreed last week is needed for this bug
(adamw, 17:34:33)
* that's all the proposals, let's do a quick run through: (adamw,
17:34:48)
* Accepted Beta blockers (adamw, 17:34:54)
* 2236398 - needs to be evaluated by anaconda team now we've accepted
it (adamw, 17:35:50)
* 2230720 , 2234928 , 2231680 are addressed, just waiting push to
stable (adamw, 17:36:30)
* 2232711 - we've attempted a fix, but lruzicka said he still saw some
kind of automatic suspend happen in testing, I am asking for more
details from him about that (adamw, 17:37:10)
* 2235100 is waiting for upstream acceptance according to pbrobinson,
2113005 we will likely need to waive again (adamw, 17:37:36)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232711
(geraldosimiao, 17:45:04)
* Open floor (adamw, 17:50:33)
Meeting ended at 17:52:58 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (208)
* geraldosimiao (78)
* frantisekz (51)
* lruzicka (40)
* kparal (34)
* zodbot (10)
* amoloney (3)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.4
.. _`MeetBot`: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functionshttps://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2023-09-04/f39-bloc…
--
You received this message due to your preference settings at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/fmnmeetingminutes.id.fedorapro…