November 2011 - mingw - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Nerijus Baliunas

Hello, I am trying to compile poppler-0.16.7 on Fedora 15. mingw32-configure fails to link libopenjpeg: checking for opj_cio_open in -lopenjpeg... no checking openjpeg.h usability... yes checking openjpeg.h presence... yes checking for openjpeg.h... yes Why? But running mingw32-cmake instead of mingw32-configure enables libopenjpeg support. Later it fails: In file included from /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/winnt.h:192:0, from /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/windef.h:253, from /home/nerijus/rpmbuild/BUILD/poppler-0.16.7/poppler/poppler-config.h:83, from /home/nerijus/rpmbuild/BUILD/poppler-0.16.7/poppler/Error.h:33, from /home/nerijus/rpmbuild/BUILD/poppler-0.16.7/goo/JpegWriter.cc:17: /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/basetsd.h:52:13: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef int INT32' /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/jmorecfg.h:164:14: error: 'INT32' has a previous declaration as 'typedef long int INT32' It is a known problem, I know wxWidgets have workaround for it. Which one should I use? Regards, Nerijus

12 years, 3 months

3
6
0 / 0

Fwd: Goocanvas for Mingw32

by Richard W.M. Jones

Thanks Egil, I am forwarding your message and the spec file to the fedora-mingw mailing list. I looked quickly over the spec file and it looks good. Rich. ----- Forwarded message from Egil Kvaleberg <egil(a)kvaleberg.com> ----- Subject: Goocanvas for Mingw32 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:54:27 +0200 From: Egil Kvaleberg <egil(a)kvaleberg.com> To: rjones(a)redhat.com I have played around with the Mingw32 for Fedora, and it absolutely seems like a very cool thing. For my purposes, I am using GTK2, which is supported, but I also need a canvas. I have been using Goocanvas (not sure what really is *the* canvas for GTK2, but I have been happy with Goocanvas). However, a Goocanvas package does not seem to be available, so I built one. Goocanvas may be of interest to others, so if you think it is suitable then please use the attached spec-file or tell me how to get involved. The spec-file for Fedora 11 is attached. Sincerely, Egil Kvaleberg -- Company: Kvaleberg AS Office: +47 22 44 31 75 Mobile: +47 920 22 780 Fax: +47 22 44 46 77 Web: http://www.kvaleberg.com/ ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v

12 years, 4 months

3
4
0 / 0

[Bug 489100] New: No cross-DLL exceptions in mingw32 compilers

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: No cross-DLL exceptions in mingw32 compilers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489100 Summary: No cross-DLL exceptions in mingw32 compilers Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: mingw32-gcc AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: wolfgang.glas(a)ev-i.at QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Version 4.3.2-12 of EPEL's version of the moingw32 cross-compiler do not support cross-DLL exceptions. I've attached the gcc bug report below. This make running a non-trivial C++ program impossible an renders the mingw32 toolchain unusable for real-world C++ programs. The mingw-w64 toolchain has solved this problem by supplying a shared libgcc, hopefully the mingw32 toolchain will follow this approach in the near future. Please keep on your tremendous work on providing the ming32 toolchain in the EPEL. TIA, Wolfgang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
15
0 / 0

Proposal: updated Fedora MinGW Packaging Guidelines

by Erik van Pienbroek

Hi all, Some time ago Kalev Lember introduced a new dependency extraction mechanism in the mingw32-filesystem package which uses the RPM 4.9 hooks. Due to this change, some instructions can now be dropped from all Fedora MinGW spec files. Because of this change a revision of the Fedora MinGW Packaging Guidelines is required. Initially we had hoped to make the switch to mingw-w64 (and thus the new packaging guidelines) earlier, but as we're still waiting on legal approval I think it would be wise to revise the original Fedora MinGW Packaging Guidelines one more time. I just updated the original packaging guidelines and put a draft up for review for the Fedora Packaging Committee. The exact changes can be seen at https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=PackagingDrafts% 2FMinGW&action=historysubmit&diff=262356&oldid=262352 The changes are pretty straightforward: * The old dependency extraction instructions can now be dropped * .def files shouldn't have to be bundled with packages anymore Before proposing these changes to the FPC I would like to put it up for review on this mailing list first. If anybody thinks my proposed changes should be rewritten or some other element needs to updated I'd like to hear about it so it can be changed before proposing it to the FPC. If I don't hear anything back in the next 24 hours I'll file a ticket at the FPC so it can be discussed in their next meeting. Kind regards, Erik van Pienbroek

12 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 756776] Review Request: mingw32-libosinfo - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756776 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2011-11-30 16:49:04 EST --- Taking for review. The comments I already mentioned in your mingw32-libvirt-glib review request (bug 754437) also apply for this package. Please resolve these first and after you've published a revised spec file I'll continue with the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 754437] Review Request: mingw32-libvirt-glib - libvirt glib integration for event

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754437 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2011-11-30 16:43:25 EST --- Taking for review - The latest upstream version is 0.0.2. Please update to this version - Please replace the %define's at the top of the .spec file with these: %global __strip %{_mingw32_strip} %global __objdump %{_mingw32_objdump} %define __debug_install_post %{_mingw32_debug_install_post} - Please add the line %{?_mingw32_debug_package} between the last %description and the %prep lines. This is required for automatic debuginfo extraction - The BuildRoot tag, the 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' from the %install section, the entire %clean section and the various %defattr lines can all be dropped as they're not needed any more with recent RPM Next to this I would also like to recommend you to name the package 'mingw-libvirt-glib' (which provides the 'mingw32-libvirt-glib' and other subpackages). We recommend this for new packages so they can easily be adjusted to have mingw-w64 support without requiring a full re-review. Support for mingw-w64 is a planned feature for Fedora 17, but is currently stalled because we're still waiting for legal approval: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2011-November/001754.html An example of a package which uses this new naming scheme can be found at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW#Example_Specfile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 727473] Review Request: mingw-dbus-glib - MinGW Windows GLib bindings for D-Bus

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727473 --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2011-11-30 16:08:29 EST --- Created attachment 538817 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=538817 Don't give a fatal error when the abstract socket checks can't be executed (because of cross-compiling) Could you please update to version 0.98 (the latest released version) ? While you're at it, could you also please add the attached patch? It makes the %{_mingw32_cache} hack which you've applied obsolete, so that can be dropped as well. The patch is basically a copy of the configure.ac from the dbus package: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/dbus/dbus/tree/configure.ac#n796 (I wasn't able to find the exact commit so quick in git, but as you can see it's the exact same code as used in dbus-glib) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 726895] Review Request: mingw-harfbuzz - MinGW Windows HarfBuzz library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726895 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2011-11-30 15:14:51 EST --- Kalev, do you know if this package is intended to be used by pango and/or qt in the future? I think we should try to avoid introducing more dependency bloat in the Gtk and Qt toolchain so we need to be careful with such changes. I would like to prevent introducing fontconfig and freetype as dependencies for the Gtk and Qt toolchain so perhaps we could better eliminate the freetype (and thus fontconfig) as dependency from this package (unless it brings a significant benefit for the win32 target of course). A quick look at the configure.ac file inside this package indicates that freetype (and cairo-ft) are optional. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 754437] Review Request: mingw32-libvirt-glib - libvirt glib integration for event

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754437 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr | |oject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 756776] Review Request: mingw32-libosinfo - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756776 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr | |oject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw November 2011