[mingw-pixman/f18] Update to 0.26.2
by Erik van Pienbroek
Summary of changes:
0ff2487... Update to 0.26.2 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
11 years, 6 months
[mingw-pixman] Update to 0.26.2
by Erik van Pienbroek
commit 0ff24874f15b6d4ad5bcd3c3ade6eb7ee159655d
Author: Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org>
Date: Wed Nov 21 23:44:35 2012 +0100
Update to 0.26.2
.gitignore | 1 +
mingw-pixman.spec | 10 +++++-----
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 54eb62e..80e011e 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ pixman-0.18.2.tar.bz2
/pixman-0.22.2.tar.gz
/pixman-0.24.2.tar.gz
/pixman-0.24.4.tar.gz
+/pixman-0.26.2.tar.gz
diff --git a/mingw-pixman.spec b/mingw-pixman.spec
index ba9e4a9..22cecc6 100644
--- a/mingw-pixman.spec
+++ b/mingw-pixman.spec
@@ -1,11 +1,8 @@
%?mingw_package_header
-%global mingw_build_win32 1
-%global mingw_build_win64 1
-
Name: mingw-pixman
-Version: 0.24.4
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Version: 0.26.2
+Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: MinGW Windows Pixman library
License: MIT
@@ -106,6 +103,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name "*.la" -delete
%changelog
+* Wed Nov 21 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.26.2-1
+- Update to 0.26.2
+
* Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.24.4-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 15e4af0..2854abc 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fee074965c310c46d9c0ab3e5fd656bf pixman-0.24.4.tar.gz
+276242da5b3af1258d072cf205d18f0b pixman-0.26.2.tar.gz
11 years, 6 months
[mingw-binutils] Update to 2.23.51.0.5 release
by Erik van Pienbroek
commit f680200b942e6363197431998327aca20fa32aee
Author: Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org>
Date: Wed Nov 21 20:59:12 2012 +0100
Update to 2.23.51.0.5 release
.gitignore | 1 +
mingw-binutils.spec | 7 +++++--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index fb154ff..ef9d2bf 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@ binutils-2.20.1.tar.bz2
/binutils-2.22.52.tar.bz2
/binutils-2.22.52.0.3.tar.bz2
/binutils-2.22.52.0.4.tar.bz2
+/binutils-2.23.51.0.5.tar.bz2
diff --git a/mingw-binutils.spec b/mingw-binutils.spec
index f156f78..4dac145 100644
--- a/mingw-binutils.spec
+++ b/mingw-binutils.spec
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
%global run_testsuite 1
Name: mingw-binutils
-Version: 2.22.52.0.4
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Version: 2.23.51.0.5
+Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Cross-compiled version of binutils for Win32 and Win64 environments
License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+
@@ -246,6 +246,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/multilib
%changelog
+* Wed Nov 21 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.23.51.0.5-1
+- Update to 2.23.51.0.5 release
+
* Mon Oct 15 2012 Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> - 2.22.52.0.4-2
- Provides: bundled(libiberty)
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index b78cc80..c6c1ab0 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-2a5beea06d6f3e21107365b91184e11c binutils-2.22.52.0.4.tar.bz2
+a08000d6c18b4667095e416816550a33 binutils-2.23.51.0.5.tar.bz2
11 years, 6 months
using mingw64 from Fedora 17/18 on RHEL6
by Daniel Villeneuve
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to install and test a cross-compilation toolchain
from RHEL6 to 64-bit Windows.
RH Support pointed me to some EPEL mingw64 RPMs, but the packages are
not up-to-date and I've been told to use Fedora 17 or 18 packages instead.
I've tried to find a "fedora.repo" file I could install in
/etc/yum.repos.d on my RHEL6 machine in order to download the mingw64
packages, but could not find it.
What would be the best way to get mingw64 to work on RHEL6?
Is there such a fedora.repo file that I could download and use from RHEL6?
Will there be dependency problems with the Fedora 17/18 RPMs for mingw64
on RHEL6?
Should I get source mingw64 RPMs and build them myself on RHEL6? If so,
which source RPMs should I use?
I've been told that mingw64 is planned for RHEL7, but I'd really start
using it on RHEL6 within a short delay.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Regards,
--
Daniel Villeneuve
11 years, 6 months