mingw April 2009

mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org

15 participants
94 discussions

[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Apr '09

07 Apr '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee> 2009-04-07 07:28:27 EDT --- I am familiar with the HowToGetSponsored page and I do have an FAS account for a while now. Please see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/kalev So far I have posted 3 packages for review (and they all block FE-NEEDSPONSOR). Besides the mingw32-libp11 I have: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=mingw32-opensc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=powwow I have also done a few unofficial reviews and commented in some bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492165 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122 In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=mingw32-cairomm I did the official review. Richard Jones checked on my review and set the fedora‑review+ flag for me. Regarding this package here, I discussed the situation with Richard Jones and he suggested that he could try setting the fedora‑cvs? flag as I still don't have a sponsor, that's the reason I posted the CVS request too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Apr '09

07 Apr '09

1 0

[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Apr '09

07 Apr '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee> 2009-04-07 05:03:42 EDT --- Thanks for your very fast review, Thomas. Richard Jones said he is not familiar with how the sponsorship system works and that he'll try setting fedora‑cvs? flag for me. That's why I requested CVS without being sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Apr '09

07 Apr '09

1 0

[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Apr '09

07 Apr '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones(a)redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Apr '09

07 Apr '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee> 2009-04-07 04:29:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libp11 Short Description: MingGW Windows libp11 library Owners: kalev rjones Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Apr '09

06 Apr '09

1 0

[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Apr '09

06 Apr '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Sailer <t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch> 2009-04-06 18:30:58 EDT --- + rpmlint output + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora LGPLv2+ + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm 9e2c5cbececde245e2d2f535bd49ce35 libp11-0.2.4.tar.gz 9e2c5cbececde245e2d2f535bd49ce35 p/libp11-0.2.4.tar.gz + package successfully builds on at least one architecture noarch n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel ok for mingw packages to have headers n/a static libraries should be in -static + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files allowed according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available n/a reviewer should build the package in mock + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures n/a review should test the package functions as described n/a scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel n/a shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin APPROVED by sailer Note: I am not a sponsor, I cannot sponsor you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Apr '09

06 Apr '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Thomas Sailer <t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch --- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer <t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch> 2009-04-06 18:20:46 EDT --- rpmlint: mingw32-libp11.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libp11.dll.a mingw32-libp11.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libp11.dll.a mingw32-libp11.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libp11.h mingw32-libp11.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/libp11.pc mingw32-libp11.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libp11.la mingw32-libp11.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libp11.dll.a mingw32-libp11.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings. (this is f10 rpmlint, f11 rpmlint would not have complained) These can be ignored as per: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Apr '09

06 Apr '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review |Review Request: |Request:mingw32-libp11 - |mingw32-libp11 - MingGW |MingGW Windows libp11 |Windows libp11 library |library | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw April 2009