mingw November 2010

mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org

16 participants
118 discussions

[Bug 643801] New: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program ld) when compiling Google Go
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '11

28 Jun '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program ld) when compiling Google Go https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643801 Summary: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program ld) when compiling Google Go Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-gcc AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: fullung(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rjones(a)redhat.com, kalev(a)smartlink.ee, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: mingw32-gcc's ld segfaults when compiling Google Go. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-gcc-4.4.2-2.fc13.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Read http://golang.org/doc/install.html 2. hg clone -r release https://go.googlecode.com/hg/ go (might need tip) 3. cd go 4. hg patch --no-commit go_make_mingw.diff 5. cd src 6. AR=i686-pc-mingw32-ar GOHOSTARCH=386 CC=i686-pc-mingw32-gcc GOOS=windows GOARCH=386 ./make.bash Actual results: quietgcc -o 8g -L"/home/alberts/go"/lib ../8l/enam.o list.o galign.o gobj.o ggen.o gsubr.o cgen.o cgen64.o cplx.o peep.o reg.o ../gc/gc.a -lbio -l9 -lm i686-pc-mingw32-gcc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program ld) Please submit a full bug report. See <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> for instructions. Expected results: 8g command should compile Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 609162] New: CVE-2010-2249 libpng: Memory leak when processing Physical Scale (sCAL) images [fedora-all]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '11

27 Jun '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2010-2249 libpng: Memory leak when processing Physical Scale (sCAL) images [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609162 Summary: CVE-2010-2249 libpng: Memory leak when processing Physical Scale (sCAL) images [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: low Priority: low Component: mingw32-libpng AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jlieskov(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 608644 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora versions. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. Forr more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, please include the bug IDs of the respective parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product. Please mention CVE ids in the RPM changelog when available. Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=608644 Please note: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. Only one tracking bug has been filed; please only close it when all affected versions are fixed. [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 571686] New: mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 May '11

18 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686 Summary: mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-filesystem AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: waananen(a)nbi.dk QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Even if the specfile includes: %define __strip %{_mingw32_strip} mingw32 cross-compiled packages does not get their DLL's or binaries stripped. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Checked with: mingw32-filesystem-56-1 How reproducible: Very easy to reproduce by building a mingw32 package. Also official Fedora mingw32 packages are not stripped either - I tested the package: mingw32-pixman-0.14.0-1.fc11. Steps to Reproduce: 1. cp -p /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll /tmp 2. i686-pc-mingw32-strip /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll Actual results: # ls -1s /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll 252 /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll 1252 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll Expected results: # ls -1s /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll 252 /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll 252 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 599227] New: mingw <pthread.h> is broken
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '11

12 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw <pthread.h> is broken https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599227 Summary: mingw <pthread.h> is broken Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-pthreads AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: eblake(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: The cross-compilation header /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pthread.h, installed as part of the mingw32-pthreads package, has several coding bugs. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-10.fc13.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Try cross-compiling any code that uses localtime_r with a second argument with side effects, or try calling (localtime_r)(arg1,arg2). 2. Try cross-compiling any project that uses gnulib's <time.h> replacement header (libvirt is an example project; it includes a ./autobuild.sh script that will automatically try a mingw cross-compilation, if you have installed a mingw portablexdr library, although that library is not yet part of fedora). Actual results: The definition of localtime_r is broken, because it evaluates the second argument twice. And, since POSIX allows one to #undef localtime_r, but there is no localtime_r function in the library, you get a link failure if you bypass the function-like macro. Finally, the pthreads-win32 library made the mistake of installing <config.h>, which is asking for namespace collision with most other autotooled packages. Expected results: <pthread.h> should not define any *_r functions, nor should it interfere with a proper <time.h>. Also, the library should not install <config.h>, but should instead modify its installed headers to be self-contained. Additional info: See this thread on bug-gnulib for more details: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2010-06/msg00007.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 629209] New: Update mingw32-runtime to 3.18
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '11

10 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Update mingw32-runtime to 3.18 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209 Summary: Update mingw32-runtime to 3.18 Product: Fedora Version: 14 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-runtime AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: atkac(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rjones(a)redhat.com, kalev(a)smartlink.ee, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When I compile TigerVNC vncviewer for Windows on Fedora 14/rawhide, output vncviewer.exe binary is broken: ... Backtrace: =>0 0x00485e4f in vncviewer (+0x85e4f) (0x00a0fe30) 1 0x0040108d __mingw_CRTStartup+0x6c() [/builddir/build/BUILD/mingwrt-3.15.2-mingw32/crt1.c:217] in vncviewer (0x00a0fe70) 2 0x0040108d __mingw_CRTStartup+0x6c() [/builddir/build/BUILD/mingwrt-3.15.2-mingw32/crt1.c:217] in vncviewer (0x00a0fe90) 3 0x00401128 WinMainCRTStartup+0x17() [/builddir/build/BUILD/mingwrt-3.15.2-mingw32/crt1.c:271] in vncviewer (0x00a0fea8) 4 0x7ede70bc call_process_entry+0xb() in kernel32 (0x00a0fee8) 5 0x7efab570 call_thread_func+0xb() in ntdll (0x00a0fef8) 6 0x7efae1f1 call_thread_entry_point+0x70() in ntdll (0x00a0ffc8) 7 0x7ef83feb call_dll_entry_point+0x65a() in ntdll (0x00a0ffe8) ... When I updated to the latest mingw runtime from upstream (mingwrt-3.18-mingw32-src) everything works fine. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-runtime-3.15.2-5.fc13 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. compile program for Windows via MinGW build chain 2. run it Actual results: crash Expected results: working binary Additional info: It seems current mingw runtime is not compatible with gcc 4.5. As I wrote above when I update to 3.18 version, problem disappears. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 52

nspr: fix for mock build
by Amorilia 07 May '11

07 May '11

Hi everyone, Here's a fix for the build problem for nspr in mock: http://github.com/amorilia/fedora-mingw/commit/1c143a5840bb15b11098edb7130e… It seems that the problem goes back all the way to AC_PROG_CC: when wine is installed, apparently AC_PROG_CC (mistakenly?) sets cross_compiler to false. Additionally, here's a sync of the spec file with the native fedora one, and a few extra build patches: http://github.com/amorilia/fedora-mingw/commit/19af2a48f6d2cc90009c581a7e8a… http://github.com/amorilia/fedora-mingw/commit/629eb75b24e1755c92041b614b40… http://github.com/amorilia/fedora-mingw/commit/44031e8cf4d0149debeb97c0c833… Although the tests build, when running them under wine, many fail. I haven't investigated this further. I don't plan to work on this anymore for the time being, so I'm simply throwing these patches here in case someone else would be interested. For quick reference, full spec file and patches: http://github.com/amorilia/fedora-mingw/tree/master/nspr/ Yours, Amorilia

2 1

Proposal: drop the hard dependency on mingw32-gettext from mingw32-glib2
by Erik van Pienbroek 07 May '11

07 May '11

Hi, Recently I was browsing the upstream GTK website and I noticed that upstream has used a special trick to build the Win32 binaries for GLib. In order to make the dependency on gettext a soft one they used a small static wrapper library called libproxy-intl [1]. With this wrapper library the GLib DLL doesn't depend directly anymore on libintl-8.dll (from mingw32-gettext). The wrapper library makes the hard dependency a runtime one. This means that if libintl-8.dll is bundled with the application then gettext translations will be used, otherwise nothing gets translated. I'd like to propose that we apply this change as well in our Fedora MinGW toolchain. Such a change consists of the following smaller changes: - Bundle the libproxy-intl code (1 .c file and 1 .h file) in the mingw32-gettext srpm as additional source files - Compile the libproxy-intl code with these 2 instructions: %{_mingw32_cc} -c libintl.c -o libintl.o -I. %{_mingw32_ar} rc libintl.a libintl.o - Replace the files libintl.{a,.dll.a,.la} generated by the gettext compilation with the libintl.a file from libproxy-intl. This makes any binary which tries to link against mingw32-gettext using '-lintl' have a soft-dependency on libintl. After this a simple rebuild of mingw32-glib2 should be sufficient enough to make mingw32-gettext a soft dependency. Next to glib2 there are also some other packages which have a hard dependency on libintl-8.dll: $ repoquery --whatrequires 'mingw32(libintl-8.dll)' mingw32-atk-0:1.32.0-1.fc14.noarch mingw32-gdk-pixbuf-0:2.22.0-1.fc14.noarch mingw32-glib2-0:2.26.0-1.fc14.noarch mingw32-gnutls-0:2.6.4-3.fc13.noarch mingw32-gtk-vnc-0:0.4.1-1.fc14.noarch mingw32-gtk2-0:2.22.0-1.fc14.noarch mingw32-gtkhtml3-0:3.32.0-1.fc14.noarch mingw32-gvnc-0:0.4.1-1.fc14.noarch mingw32-hunspell-0:1.2.8-11.fc12.noarch mingw32-libglade2-0:2.6.4-4.fc12.noarch mingw32-libidn-0:1.14-5.fc12.noarch Most of these packages (if not all) don't use gettext directly, but get linked against gettext because of it being mentioned in glib2's pkgconfig and .la files. A rebuild should be sufficient to replace the hard dependencies on those packages by soft ones. However, in order to prevent the libproxy-intl functions from being exported in other DLL's (as mentioned on [1]) I think it's better drop the reference to libintl from glib2's pkgconfig and .la files. As most of the packages mentioned above don't use gettext directly, but the GLib gettext functions to handle translations this shouldn't cause any major problems. As the glib2 headers depend on the libintl.h header a 'Requires: mingw32-gettext' also needs to be added to the mingw32-glib2 package. I already applied these changes in a testing repository for a generic cross compiler framework (coming soon!) [2][3] and it works fine there. Another thing GTK upstream has done in their Win32 binaries is using win-iconv instead of GNU iconv. I just put up a review request for mingw32-win-iconv at [4]. Could somebody please review that package? Does everybody agree to these changes? Kind regards, Erik van Pienbroek [1]: http://www.gtk.org/download-windows.html [2]: http://svn.openftd.org/svn/fedora_cross [3]: http://svn.openftd.org/viewvc/Fedora%20Cross%20Compiler% 20Framework/ [4]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642208

2 5

[Bug 499992] New: Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web content engine library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '10

17 Dec '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web content engine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web content engine library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Depends on: 499983,499986,499991 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-WebKit.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-WebKit-1.1.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: WebKit is an open source web browser engine. Koji scratch build: none for now because mingw32-libsoup, mingw32-libxslt and mingw32-libidn aren't in Fedora yet Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 29

[Bug 539698] New: debuginfo package conflict between binutils and mingw32-binutils
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Dec '10

03 Dec '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: debuginfo package conflict between binutils and mingw32-binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539698 Summary: debuginfo package conflict between binutils and mingw32-binutils Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: mingw32-binutils AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jarin.franek(a)post.cz QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Trying to install both binutils debuginfo and mingw32-binutils debuginfo packages (In fact, I did install debuginfo for the whole distribution). The transaction check fails with a conflict. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-binutils-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 binutils-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 How reproducible: see the steps: Steps to Reproduce: 1. debuginfo-install binutils 2. debuginfo-install mingw32-binutils Actual results: ----------------------------------------snippet Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/bfd/elf.c from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/bfd/elfcode.h from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/bfd/section.c from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/gas/dw2gencfi.c from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/ld/ldmain.c from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 Error Summary ------------- ----------------------------------------snippet Expected results: No conflict. Since both binutils and mingw32-binutils install in-parallel without problems, I would expect their debuginfo packages to install in-parallel as well. Additional info: May concern other mingw32-* packages as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 595006] New: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Dec '10

03 Dec '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595006 Summary: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-dlfcn AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: stebbins(a)jetheaddev.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When attempting to link with libdl.a this error occurs: /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libdl.a: could not read symbols: Archive has no index; run ranlib to add one Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Release : 0.7.r11.fc12 Steps to Reproduce: 1. gcc -static somefile.c -o some.exe -ldl Additional info: running ranlib fixes the problem: # i686-pc-mingw32-ranlib libdl.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw November 2010