Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951
--- Comment #15 from Nerijus Baliunas <nerijus(a)users.sourceforge.net> 2010-11-23 20:25:42 EST ---
This patch does not help on F14, I still get error as in Comment 12. But there
is no more error as in Comment 10 w/o applying patch in Comment 11, as it was
on F13.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
External Bug ID| |Qt Bug Tracker 14467
External Bug ID|Qt Bug Tracker QTBUG-14467 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
External Bug ID| |Qt Bug Tracker QTBUG-14467
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Triaged
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> 2010-11-23 15:28:01 EST ---
fine with me, let's do it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> 2010-11-23 15:13:24 EST ---
I guess that's enough justification for me, let's apply the patch. What do the
other Qt comaintainers think?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl
Flag|needinfo?(fedora-mingw@list |
|s.fedoraproject.org) |
--- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2010-11-23 15:01:38 EST ---
> So, my understanding is that the Fedora MinGW maintainers would like us to
> apply this patch to our qt package, is that correct?
That's correct
> If it is so, since it shouldn't affect anybody else, I'm OK with applying that
> patch to our Qt packaging. I'd prefer this to get sorted out upstream, but I'm
> OK with the patch if the MinGW folks are convinced it's right.
>
> (I personally have some reservations about a variable named $${QT_LIBINFIX}
> being made a postfix though. MinGW folks: are you sure this makes sense?)
We've asked upstream in the mentioned bugreport what the correct behaviour
should be (should the suffix be 'd4' of '4d'? where does the '4' come from?).
Unfortunately we haven't seen any response to that question so our best guess
is to work around it in the qmake mkspecs files for now until upstream provides
more information.
The win32 binaries provided by upstream all use the suffix 'd4' as well so our
packaging looks okay from that point of view
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |needinfo?(fedora-mingw@list
| |s.fedoraproject.org)
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> 2010-11-23 14:43:03 EST ---
So, my understanding is that the Fedora MinGW maintainers would like us to
apply this patch to our qt package, is that correct?
If it is so, since it shouldn't affect anybody else, I'm OK with applying that
patch to our Qt packaging. I'd prefer this to get sorted out upstream, but I'm
OK with the patch if the MinGW folks are convinced it's right.
(I personally have some reservations about a variable named $${QT_LIBINFIX}
being made a postfix though. MinGW folks: are you sure this makes sense?)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
Version: 14
Component: qt
Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> has asked MinGW Maintenance Account
<fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> for needinfo:
Bug 653674: Fails to create debug build of Qt projects on mingw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
------- Additional Comments from Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org>
So, my understanding is that the Fedora MinGW maintainers would like us to
apply this patch to our qt package, is that correct?
If it is so, since it shouldn't affect anybody else, I'm OK with applying that
patch to our Qt packaging. I'd prefer this to get sorted out upstream, but I'm
OK with the patch if the MinGW folks are convinced it's right.
(I personally have some reservations about a variable named $${QT_LIBINFIX}
being made a postfix though. MinGW folks: are you sure this makes sense?)